Towards a Holistic Framework for Academic Library Furniture Design: Integrating Aesthetic Experience, Functionality, and Pedagogy for 21st-Century Learning

Authors

  • Nurul Ain Haron INTI Centre of Art and Design, INTI International College Subang
  • S’harin Mokhtar Faculty of Art & Design, Universiti Teknologi MARA, 40450 Shah Alam, Selangor, MALAYSIA
  • Natrina MP Toyong Faculty of Art & Design, Universiti Teknologi MARA, 40450 Shah Alam, Selangor, MALAYSIA

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24191/idealogy.v11i1.915

Abstract

Academic libraries are evolving from quiet repositories of books into hybrid learning commons that foster collaboration, creativity, and digital fluency. Within this transformation, furniture is no longer passive equipment but a key mediator between body, technology, and space that shapes cognitive, emotional and social engagement that underpins 21st-century learning. Yet scholarship on libraries remains fragmented. Most studies examine either functionality (ergonomics, proxemics, spatial efficiency) or aesthetic experience (comfort, ambience, emotional appeal) and rarely integrate these perspectives with contemporary pedagogy. This paper proposes a holistic conceptual framework for academic library furniture design grounded in a Systematic Literature Review (SLR) of research across environmental psychology, higher-education studies, ergonomics, and design. Guided by PRISMA screening, the review identified recurring concepts such as sensory-motor engagement, neuroaesthetic valuation, universal design and digitally enhanced learning. The findings were synthesised into three interwoven theoretical domains. 1) Aesthetic Experience, which encompasses sensory-motor stimulation, emotional resonance, and cultural meaning-making; 2) Ergonomic and Environmental Design, by integrating proxemics, anthropometrics, universal accessibility, and technology infrastructure; 3) Learning Environment and Pedagogy, which aligns physical settings with constructivist, collaborative, and blended learning strategies. By bridging design, psychology, and education, the framework positions furniture as an aesthetic pedagogical interface and provides a robust platform for empirical testing through wellbeing metrics, collaborative behaviour analysis and digital engagement studies. It offers designers, educators and institutions a future ready for creating library environments that sustain and transform 21st-century learning. 

 

Keywords: Neuroaesthetic, Academic library, 21st century learning, Furniture design. 

References

Akinola, S. A. (2022). Management of Academic Library Services in the 21st Century Digital Dispensation. Alexandria the Journal of National and International Library and Information Issues. https://doi.org/10.1177/09557490231217714

Aleem, H., & Grzywacz, N. M. (2025). The Temporal Instability of Aesthetic Preferences. Psychology of Aesthetics Creativity and the Arts. https://doi.org/10.1037/aca0000543

Ansari, S., Nikpay, A., & Varmazyar, S. (2018). Design and Development of an Ergonomic Chair for Students in Educational Settings. Health Scope. https://doi.org/10.5812/jhealthscope.60531

Bodrick, M. M., Almutairi, M. B., Alassaf, M. I., Juffali, L. Al, Alrasi, M. Y., Alhawas, A. A., Obaid, A. A., Alsuhaim, M. I., Alhabib, I. M., & Albisher, A. K. (2025). Innovative Learning Spaces and the Creative Use of Professional Conversations in Leadership Capability Advancement. Journal of Learning and Development Studies. https://doi.org/10.32996/jlds.2025.5.2.2

Brown, A., Lawrence, J., Basson, M., Axelsen, M., Redmond, P., Turner, J., Maloney, S., & Galligan, L. (2022). The Creation of a Nudging Protocol to Support Online Student Engagement in Higher Education. Active Learning in Higher Education. https://doi.org/10.1177/14697874211039077

Cai, P., & Wang, J. (2024). The Effect of Background Colors of Learning Materials on Memory:evidence From Chinese Characters. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-5266192/v1

Chatterjee, A., & Vartanian, O. (2014). Neuroaesthetics. Trends in Cognitive Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2014.03.003

Chee, K. N. (2025). Affectagogy Unleashed. https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3373-0184-6.ch012

Christie, B., Charkhkar, H., Shell, C. E., Marasco, P. D., Tyler, D. J., & Triolo, R. J. (2019). Visual Inputs and Postural Manipulations Affect the Location of Somatosensory Percepts Elicited by Electrical Stimulation. Scientific Reports. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-47867-1

D. Thornburg, D. (2004). Campfires in Cyberspace: Primordial Metaphors for Learning in the 21st Century. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INSTRUCTIONAL TECHNOLOGY AND DISTANCE LEARNING , 1, 7–14.

Dreyfuss, H., & R Tilley, A. (2002). The Measure of Man and Woman: Human Factors in Design (Revised). John Wiley & Sons.

Emir, T., Varol, T., & Özel, H. B. (2022). Computer-Assisted Ergonomic Analysis of Working Postures Causing Strain. European Journal of Forest Engineering. https://doi.org/10.33904/ejfe.1188547

Grádaigh, S. Ó., Connolly, C., Mahon, B. Mac, Agnew, A., & Poole, W. S. (2021). An Investigation of Emergency Virtual Observation (EVO) in Initial Teacher Education, in Australia and Ireland During the COVID-19 Pandemic. Irish Educational Studies. https://doi.org/10.1080/03323315.2021.1916561

Hall, E. T., Birdwhistell, R. L., Bock, B., Bohannan, P., Diebold, , A. Richard, Durbin, M., Edmonson, M. S., Fischer, J. L., Hymes, D., Kimball, S. T., La Barre, W., McClellan, J. E., Marshall, D. S., Milner, G. B., Sarles, H. B., Trager, G. L., & Vayda, A. P. (1968). Proxemics [and Comments and Replies]. Current Anthropology, 9(2/3), 83–108. https://doi.org/10.1086/200975

Kang, W. (2023). The Use of Virtual Patients for Breaking Bad News: A Rapid Review. The Clinical Teacher. https://doi.org/10.1111/tct.13681

Kariippanon, K. E., Cliff, D. P., Ellis, Y., Ucci, M., Okely, A. D., & Parrish, A. (2020). School Flexible Learning Spaces, Student Movement Behavior and Educational Outcomes Among Adolescents: A Mixed‐Methods Systematic Review. Journal of School Health. https://doi.org/10.1111/josh.12984

Knight, C. (2025). ‘There’s This Divide, the Nice Part and the Chaotic Part’: University Students’ Journeys to the Classroom as an Emotional Experience. Emotions and Society. https://doi.org/10.1332/26316897y2025d000000065

Lazar, J. (2021). Managing Digital Accessibility at Universities During the COVID-19 Pandemic. Universal Access in the Information Society. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-021-00792-5

Loo, B. P. Y., & Fan, Z. (2023). Social Interaction in Public Space: Spatial Edges, Moveable Furniture, and Visual Landmarks. Environment and Planning B Urban Analytics and City Science. https://doi.org/10.1177/23998083231160549

Magsamen, S., Golden, T. L., Towriss, C., & Allen, A. J. (2023). The Impact Thinking Framework: A Process for Advancing Research-to-Practice Initiatives in Neuroaesthetics. Frontiers in Psychology. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1129334

Mahat, M., Awad, V., Bradbeer, C., Guo, C., Imms, W., & Morris, J. E. (2023). Furniture for Engagement. https://doi.org/10.46580/124374

Manca, S., Cerina, V., Tobia, V., Sacchi, S., & Fornara, F. (2020). The Effect of School Design on Users’ Responses: A Systematic Review (2008–2017). Sustainability. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12083453

Martzoukou, K. (2020). Academic Libraries in COVID-19: A Renewed Mission for Digital Literacy. Library Management. https://doi.org/10.1108/lm-09-2020-0131

McEwan, K., Collett, H., Nairn, J. R., Bird, J., Faghy, M. A., Pfeifer, E., Jackson, J., Cook, C., & Bond, A. (2022). The Feasibility and Impact of Practising Online Forest Bathing to Improve Anxiety, Rumination, Social Connection and Long-Covid Symptoms: A Pilot Study. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192214905

Meng, P., Diao, Z., Meng, X., & Zhang, L. (2025). Evaluating the Temporal Effect of Image Features on Dynamic Aesthetic Experience of Generative Art. Empirical Studies of the Arts. https://doi.org/10.1177/02762374241311881

Mynott, J. P., Foy, K., Hendry, F., & Stewart, L. (2022). Virtual Observations: A Situational Analysis of a Technological Response to Practicum Assessment During a Pandemic. https://doi.org/10.31338/2657-6007.kp.2021-4.6

Mynott, J. P., Hendry, F., Edwards, K., & Hossick, R. (2024). Continuing Virtual Observations: A Situational Review of Student Perspectives. Research in Education. https://doi.org/10.1177/00345237241257172

Norman, D. A. (2013). The Design of Everyday Things, revised and expanded edition (2nd revised edition). MIT Press.

Ody, E., Kircher, T., Straube, B., & He, Y. (2023). Pre‐movement Event‐related Potentials and Multivariate Pattern of EEG Encode Action Outcome Prediction. Human Brain Mapping. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.26506

Onwusu-Ansah, S., & Korkuvi, P. J. (2024). Re-Positioning University Libraries for Relevance in a Dynamic Learning Environment. Information Impact Journal of Information and Knowledge Management. https://doi.org/10.4314/iijikm.v14i2.5

Pheasant, S., & Haslegrave, C. M. (2018). Bodyspace (3rd ed.). CRC Press. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781315375212

Pinheiro, A. P., Schwartze, M., Gutiérrez-Domínguez, F.-J., & Kotz, S. A. (2020). Real and Imagined Sensory Feedback Have Comparable Effects on Action Anticipation. Cortex. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2020.04.030

Protasenko, O., & Mygal, G. (2021). Еко-Ергономічне Проектування Робочого Середовища. Open Information and Computer Integrated Technologies. https://doi.org/10.32620/oikit.2020.89.09

Rapanta, C., Botturi, L., Goodyear, P., Ortiz, L. G., & Koole, M. (2021). Balancing Technology, Pedagogy and the New Normal: Post-Pandemic Challenges for Higher Education. Postdigital Science and Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-021-00249-1

Rapoport, A. (1990). History and Precedent in Environmental Design. Springer US. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-0571-2

Round, P., & Subban, P. (2023). Aiming for Success Through a Qualitative Examination of Educator Perceptions of Flexible Learning Spaces. Journal of Education Teaching and Social Studies. https://doi.org/10.22158/jetss.v5n3p145

Scandolo, L., & Fraichard, T. (2011). An Anthropomorphic Navigation Scheme for Dynamic Scenarios. https://doi.org/10.1109/icra.2011.5979772

Shaleh, A. D., Asyifa, N., & Abhistha, T. (2022). The Role of Multi-Function Furniture in the Pandemic Era. International Journal of Design. https://doi.org/10.34010/injudes.v2i0.7339

Shardlow, J. (2023). Experience, Time, Objects, and Processes. Noûs. https://doi.org/10.1111/nous.12474

Starkey, L., Leggett, V., Anslow, C., & Ackley, A. (2021). The Use of Furniture in a Student-Centred Primary School Learning Environment. New Zealand Journal of Educational Studies. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40841-020-00187-9

Ukabi, E., & Gürdallı, H. (2021). Comparative Study on Restaurants’ Furniture: Ginkgo and Niazi’s Restaurants in Famagusta, Cyprus. Civil Engineering and Architecture. https://doi.org/10.13189/cea.2021.090103

Vaisvaser, S., King, J. L., Orkibi, H., & Aleem, H. (2024). Neurodynamics of Relational Aesthetic Engagement in Creative Arts Therapies. Review of General Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1177/10892680241260840

Vercillo, T., O’Neil, S., & Jiang, F. (2018). Action–effect Contingency Modulates the Readiness Potential. Neuroimage. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.08.028

Wassiliwizky, E., & Menninghaus, W. (2021). Why and How Should Cognitive Science Care About Aesthetics? Trends in Cognitive Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2021.03.008

Xie, I., Joo, S., & Matusiak, K. K. (2020). Digital Library Evaluation Measures in Academic Settings: Perspectives From Scholars and Practitioners. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science. https://doi.org/10.1177/0961000620935505

Буров, О. (2019). Human Factors/Ergonomics in eWorld: Methodology, Techniques and Applications. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-20494-5_43

Downloads

Published

2026-04-01