Spatial and Environmental Requirements for Integrating Decentralised Wet Anaerobic Digestion Systems in Heritage Urban Contexts: George Town, Penang

Authors

  • Fikriah Hani Department of Built Environment Studies and Technology, Faculty of Built Environment, Universiti Teknologi MARA Perak Branch, Seri Iskandar Campus, 32610 Seri Iskandar, Perak, Malaysia.
  • Salahuddin Abdul Hakeem Department of Built Environment Studies and Technology, Faculty of Built Environment, Universiti Teknologi MARA Perak Branch, Seri Iskandar Campus, 32610 Seri Iskandar, Perak, Malaysia.
  • Farid Al Hakeem Department of Built Environment Studies and Technology, Faculty of Built Environment, Universiti Teknologi MARA Perak Branch, Seri Iskandar Campus, 32610 Seri Iskandar, Perak, Malaysia.
  • Muhammad Assyahmizi Department of Built Environment Studies and Technology, Faculty of Built Environment, Universiti Teknologi MARA Perak Branch, Seri Iskandar Campus, 32610 Seri Iskandar, Perak, Malaysia.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24191/idealogy.v11i1.941

Keywords:

Wet anaerobic digestion, heritage urban context, food waste-to-energy (FWtE), adaptive reuse, spatial and environmental requirements

Abstract

Integrating decentralised food waste-to-energy (FWtE) systems within heritage urban environments demands alignment between technical infrastructure, spatial feasibility, and conservation responsibility. While decentralised wet anaerobic digestion (AD) systems have been extensively studied from engineering and environmental perspectives, limited research has translated their operational parameters into architectural integration frameworks for heritage adaptive reuse contexts. This study examines the spatial and environmental requirements for integrating decentralised wet AD systems within heritage urban settings, with reference to George Town, Penang. An analytical literature review was conducted to extract and categorise operational and biochemical parameters of wet AD systems, identifying their structural and environmental implications. This was followed by a comparative precedent analysis of three decentralised installations to evaluate spatial configuration, structural loading, and environmental control conditions. Through process-to-space mapping and cross-case synthesis, technical process requirements were translated into architectural integration criteria. The findings reveal consistent functional compartmentalisation across feedstock preparation, digestion, gas handling, energy conversion, and digestate management zones, each imposing specific structural, ventilation, safety, and service access requirements. The study proposes a structured set of spatial and environmental criteria that convert technical process demands into architectural considerations, enabling informed early-stage feasibility evaluation of decentralised wet AD integration within conservation-sensitive urban contexts. 

 

Keywords: Wet anaerobic digestion, heritage urban context, food waste-to-energy (FWtE), adaptive reuse, spatial and environmental requirements 

References

Bullen, P. A., & Love, P. E. D. (2011). Adaptive reuse of heritage buildings. Structural Survey, 29(5), 411–421. https://doi.org/10.1108/02630801111182439

Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. (2019). The state of food and agriculture 2019: Moving forward on food loss and waste reduction. https://www.fao.org/3/ca6030en/ca6030en.pdf

Geissdoerfer, M., Savaget, P., Bocken, N. M. P., & Hultink, E. J. (2017). The circular economy – A new sustainability paradigm? Journal of Cleaner Production, 143, 757–768. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.12.048

George Town World Heritage Incorporated. (2022). George Town World Heritage Site management report. https://gtwhi.com.my

International Council on Monuments and Sites. (2013). The Burra Charter: The Australia ICOMOS charter for places of cultural significance. https://australia.icomos.org/publications/charters/

Karki, R., Chuenchart, W., Surendra, K. C., Shrestha, S., Raskin, L., Sung, S., Hashimoto, A., & Khanal, S. K. (2021). Anaerobic co-digestion: Current status and perspectives. Bioresource Technology, 330, 125001. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2021.125001

Kennedy, C., Cuddihy, J., & Engel-Yan, J. (2007). The changing metabolism of cities. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 11(2), 43–59. https://doi.org/10.1162/jie.2007.1107

Khalid, A., Rashid, M., & Hameed, S. (2019). Anaerobic digestion of food waste: A review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 104, 303–318. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2019.01.001

Li, Y., Zhang, R., Chen, C., Liu, G., He, Y., & Liu, X. (2022). Urban-scale wet anaerobic digestion systems for decentralised food waste management. Journal of Cleaner Production, 330, 129–140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.129140

Mata-Álvarez, J., Dosta, J., Romero-Güiza, M. S., Fonoll, X., Peces, M., & Astals, S. (2014). A critical review on anaerobic co-digestion achievements between 2010 and 2013. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 36, 412–427. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2014.04.039

Merman, H., Tagie, G., Apandi, W. N. W. M., Ismail, I., & Jainal, A. M. (2023). The impact of creative activities involving cooking oil waste on sustainable environments. Idealogy Journal, 8(1), 52–63. https://doi.org/10.24191/idealogy.v8i1.388

News@NUS. (2024). Food waste at East Coast Lagoon Food Village to be turned into energy and fertiliser under pilot project. National University of Singapore. https://news.nus.edu.sg/

Penang State Government. (2016). Special Area Plan for George Town World Heritage Site. Penang State Town and Country Planning Department.

Pracucci, A., & Zaffagnini, T. (2019). Organic waste management through anaerobic digester technologies in urban areas: A multicriterial predesign tool to support urban strategies. UPLanD – Journal of Urban Planning, Landscape & Environmental Design, 4(2), 49–62. http://upland.it

SEaB Energy. (2020). Flexibuster™ anaerobic digestion system. https://www.seab.energy

Solid Waste and Public Cleansing Management Corporation. (2022). National solid waste management report 2022. https://www.swcorp.gov.my

Tiong, Y., Tan, J., Lim, S., & Lee, C. (2024). Decentralised anaerobic digestion at hawker centres in Singapore. Sustainable Cities and Society, 95, 104–118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2023.104118

United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP). (2024). Food waste index report 2024. https://www.unep.org

Walker, M., Banks, C., Heaven, S., & Frederickson, J. (2017). Micro-scale anaerobic digestion in dense urban environments: A case study. Waste Management, 61, 44–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2016.12.028

Weiland, P. (2010). Biogas production: Current state and perspectives. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 85, 849–860. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-009-2246-7

Downloads

Published

2026-04-01

Most read articles by the same author(s)