CLO3D and Posthumanism: Rethinking the Relationship Between Body, Fabric, and Digital Space in Malaysian Fashion

Authors

  • Maarof Saleh College of Creative Arts, University Teknologi MARA, Perak Branch, 32610 Seri Iskandar, Perak, Malaysia
  • Anis Nadiah Baharudin ollege of Creative Arts, University Teknologi MARA, Perak Branch, 32610 Seri Iskandar, Perak, Malaysia
  • Hasma Ahmadm College of Creative Arts, Universiti Teknologi MARA, 40450 Shah Alam Selangor, Malaysia
  • Reyilan Ainaidu Taylor's Design School, Taylor's University Lakeside Campus, Subang Jaya, Selangor, Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24191/idealogy.v10i1.740

Keywords:

Posthumanism, Digital Fashion, CLO3D, Malaysian Cultural Identity, Non-Human Agency

Abstract

This study examines how CLO3D, a 3D fashion design software, reconfigures the relationship between body, fabric, and cultural identity in Malaysia’s fashion industry through a posthumanist lens. By analysing qualitative interviews with six Malaysian designers and visual-textual artifacts from CLO3D projects, the research reveals three transformative dynamics: (1) the emergence of digital corporeality, where non-normative avatars disrupt anthropocentric ideals of the body; (2) distributed agency between human designers and algorithmic tools, challenging traditional notions of authorship; and (3) the hybridization of cultural heritage, as motifs like batik and songket merge with cyber-digital aesthetics. Findings demonstrate CLO3D’s dual role as a decolonial tool for subverting Eurocentric fashion hierarchies and a neoliberal force that risks commodifying cultural symbols. The study highlights tensions between sustainability and digital consumerism, as well as debates over the devaluation of artisanal craftsmanship in virtual workflows. By centering Malaysia’s postcolonial context, this article addresses gaps in non-Western perspectives on digital fashion. It concludes with recommendations for integrating posthumanist frameworks into ASEAN fashion pedagogy, fostering ethical digital preservation of cultural heritage, and advocating for green technologies to mitigate CLO3D’s environmental footprint. This research contributes to broader discourses on technology’s role in redefining identity, materiality, and agency in Global South creative industries.

References

Ahmed, S. (2021). Neoliberalism and the digital commodification of cultural symbols. Global Fashion Studies, 5(3), 112–130.

Barad, K. (2007). Meeting the universe halfway: Quantum physics and the entanglement of matter and meaning. Duke University Press.

Bennett, J. (2010). Vibrant matter: A political ecology of things. Duke University Press.

Betts, L. (2020). Algorithmic agency in fashion design: The role of 3D software in creative workflows. International Journal of Fashion Design, Technology and Education, 13(3), 287– 299.

Braidotti, R. (2013). The posthuman. Polity Press.

Bugg, J. (2021). Digital fashion: The new industrial revolution. Fashion Practice, 13(2), 123–145. Chua, L. (2020). Crafting modernity: Artisanal labour and technology in Southeast Asia. Journal of Material Culture, 25(4), 432–450.

CLO3D. (2023). Virtual fashion design software. https://www.clo3d.com

CREST. (2023). Digital transformation in Malaysia’s fashion industry: Challenges and opportunities.

Collaborative Research in Engineering, Science and Technology.

Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1987). A thousand plateaus: Capitalism and schizophrenia. University of Minnesota Press.

Fletcher, K. (2014). Sustainable fashion and textiles: Design journeys (2nd ed.). Routledge.

Haraway, D. J. (1988). Situated knowledges: The science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspective. Feminist Studies, 14(3), 575–599.

Hassan, R. (2019). Songket: The royal heritage of Malaysia. Institut Terjemahan & Buku Malaysia.

Ismail, A. (2021). Reimagining Baju Kurung in the digital age: A postcolonial critique. Asian Journal of Cultural Studies, 14(4), 89–105.

Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor-network-theory. Oxford University Press.

Lee, H. (2022). Digital hanbok: Tradition meets technology. Journal of Asian Design, 9(1), 45–67. MATRADE. (2021). ASEAN digital fashion report: Opportunities for Malaysian designers. Malaysian External Trade Development Corporation.

McKinsey & Company. (2021). The state of fashion 2022: Navigating uncertainty. McKinsey Global Fashion Index.

Ministry of Tourism, Arts and Culture Malaysia. (2022). National craft policy 2022–2030. Government of Malaysia.

Mohamed, N., & Ahmad, S. (2020). Batik digitisation: Preserving Malaysian heritage through 3D technology. Journal of Southeast Asian Arts, 8(1), 22–40.

Quijano, A. (2007). Coloniality and modernity/rationality. Cultural Studies, 21(2-3), 168–178. Said, E. W. (1978). Orientalism. Pantheon Books.

Tan, P. (2022). Digital innovation in ASEAN’s creative industries: A case study of Malaysia and Indonesia. ASEAN Economic Review, 18(2), 75–92.

UNESCO. (2018). Malaysian batik: Safeguarding intangible cultural heritage. UNESCO Publishing.

Published

2025-06-10 — Updated on 2025-06-10

Versions