Teachers Who Reflect, Teach Better: Reflective Practice at The Heart of Teachers’ Professional Development Programs
Abstract
While there is a significant amount of research and literature to explain the role of reflective practice in teaching, there is little research that reported the extent of such practice on classroom instructions and its spill effects on student learning outcomes. For this reason, this paper looks at the magnitude of reflective practice in shaping classroom instructions and how it facilitates for better student performance within the context of teachers’ professional development (PD) programs. Hence, the focus of the paper is two-fold: examining teachers’ PD programs that promoted reflective practice; and the relationship between reflective practice and student performance. The discussion on teachers’ reflective practice is timely. In particular, with the growing educational research and increasing body of evidence that pointed towards PD as having a significant influence on student achievement (Achinstein & Athanases, 2006; Fullan, 1990; Little, 2001). In addition, most PD efforts focused on teacher collaboration as a strategy for teaching improvement and eventually better academic performance of the students (Achinstein & Athanases, 2006). Many educators (Fendler, 2003; Loughran, 2002; Schon, 1983; Walkington, 2005) viewed reflective practice as situated at the heart of PD programs that sought teachers to examine their practice for improvement. This paper assists policy makers and education reformists in re-examining their PD efforts in targeting for variables that matter.
Keywords: reflective practice, teacher reflection, professional development, teacher professionalism
References
Anderson, J.R. (1985). Cognitive psychology and its implications. San Francisco: Freeman.
Archer, J. (1999, 29 November – 2 December). Teachers' beliefs about successful teaching and learning. Paper presented at the combined meeting of the Australian Association for Research in Education and the New Zealand Association for Research in Education. Retrieved February 12, 2010 from http://www.aare.edu.au/99pap/arc99491.htm
Ball, D.L. & Cohen, D. K. (1999). Developing practice, developing practitioners: toward a practice-based theory of professional development. In L. Darling-Hammond & G. Skyes (Eds.), Teaching as the learning professional: Handbook of policy and practice. (pp. 3-32). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Bonner, P. J. (2006). Transformation of teacher attitude and approach to math instruction through collaborative action research. Teacher Education Quarterly, 33(3), 27-44.
Borko, H. (2004). Professional development and teacher learning: Mapping the terrain. Educational Researcher, 33(8), 3-15.
Brophy, J.E. (1988). Research on teacher effects: Uses and abuses. Elementary School Journal, 89(1), 3-21.
Calderhead, J. (1987, April). Cognition and metacognition in teachers’ professional development. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association. Washington. DC.
Carrington, S., Deppeler, M., & Moss, J. (2010). Cultivating teachers’ beliefs, knowledge and skills for leading change in schools. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 35(1). Retrieved September 2, 2010, from http://ajte.education.ecu.edu.au/issues/PDF/351/Carrington.pdf
Carter, K. (1992) Creating cases for the development of teacher knowledge. In T., Russell, & H. Munnby (Eds), Teachers and teaching: From classroom to reflection (pp.110-112). The Falmer Press.
Cho, H. (2005). A grassroots EFL PD group: A case study of the Korean English teachers’ group. Second Language Studies, 23(2), 70-101.
Clark, C. M. & Peterson, P. L. (1986). Teachers' thought processes. In M. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (pp. 255-296). New York: Macmillan.
Cochran-Smith, M., & Lytle, S.L. (2001). Beyond certainty: Taking an inquiry stance on. In Lieberman, A. & Miller, L., Teachers caught in the action : PD that matters (pp. 45-60). New York: Teachers College Press.
Dann, H.D. (1990). Subjective theories: A new approach to psychological research and educational practice. In G.R. Semin & K.J. Gergen (Eds.), Everyday understandings: Social and scientific implications (pp. 227-243). London: Sage Publications.
Dewey, J. (1933). How we think. New York: Health & Co.
Eaker, D.J., Noblit, G.W. & Rogers, D.L. (1992). Reconsidering effective PD: Reflective practice and elaborated culture as desirable outcomes. In Hyde, A.A., & Pink, W.T., Effective PD for school change (pp. 153-168). New Jersey: Ablex Publishing Corporation.
Effandi, Z., & Md Yusoff, D. (2009). Assessing mathematics teachers’ professional development needs. European Journal of Social Sciences, 8(2), 225-231.
Elbaz, F. (1983). Teacher Thinking: A study of Practical Knowledge. London: Croom Helm.
Eraut, , M. (1995). Developing professional knowledge within a client-centered orientation. In T.R. Guskey & M. Huberman (Eds.), Professional development in education: New paradigms and practices (pp.253-267). New York: Teachers College Press.
Fairbanks, C.M., Duffy, G.G., Faircloth, B.S., He, Y., Levin, B., Rohr, J., & Stein, C. (2010). Beyond knowledge: exploring why some teachers are more thoughtfully adaptive than others. Journal of Teacher Education, 61(1-2), 161-171.
Fendler, L. (2003). Teacher reflection in a hall of mirrors: Historical influences and political reverberations. Educational Researcher, 32(3), 16-25.
Foss, D.H., & Kleinsasser, R.C. (1996). Preservice elementary teachers’ views of pedagogical and mathematical content knowledge. Teaching and Teacher Education, 12(4), 429-442.
Fullan, M. (1990). PD, innovation and institutional development. In B. Joyce (Eds.), Changing school culture through PD (pp. 3-25). Virginia: Yearbook of the Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Goh, P.S. (2011). Listening to the concerns of student teachers in Malaysia during teaching practice. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 36(2), 92-103. Retrieved from http://ajte.education.ecu.edu.au/issues/EarlyPub/Goh.pdf
Good, T.L. & Brophy, J.E. (1997). Looking in classrooms (7th ed.). New York: Addison-Wesley.
Greene, M. (2001). Educational purposes and teacher development. In A. Lieberman & L. Miller (Eds.), Teacher caught in the action: Professional development that matters (pp.3-11). New York: Teachers College.
Greeno, J. G., Collins, A. M., & Resnick, L. B. (1996). Cognition and learning. In D. Berliner and R. Calfee (Eds.), Handbook of Educational Psychology (pp. 15-41). New York: MacMillian.
Grossman, P., & Richert, A. (1988). Unacknowledged knowledge and growth: A re-examination of the effects of teacher education. Teacher and Teacher Education, 4, 53-62.
Grossman, P., Wineburg, S., & Woolworth, S. (2001). Toward a theory of teacher community. Teachers College Record, 103, 942-1012.
Grundy, S. (1982). Three modes of action research. Curriculum Perspectives, 2(3), 23-34.
Hall, S. (1997, 15-17 February). Forms of reflective teaching practice in higher education. Paper presented at Teaching and Learning Forum, Murdoch University. Retrieved October 11, 2010 from http://Isn.curtin.edu.au/tfl/tfl1997/hall.html
Haney, J. J., Czerniak, C. M., & Lumpe, A. T. (1996). Teacher beliefs and intentions regarding the implementation of science education reform strands. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33(9), 971-993.
Helman, L. (2006). What’s in a conversation? Mentoring stances in coaching conferences and how they matter. In Achinstein, B. & Athanases, S.Z., Mentors in the making: developing new leaders for new teachers (pp. 69-82). New York : Teachers College Press.
Hyde, A.A., & Pink, W.T. (1992). Thinking about effective PD. In Hyde, A.A., & Pink, W.T., Effective PD for school change (pp. 3-30). New Jersey : Ablex Publishing Corporation.
Johnson, C.C. & Fargo, J.D. (2010). Urban school reform enabled by transformative PD: Impact on teacher change and student learning of science. Urban Education, 45(1), 4-29.
Joyce, B., Murphy, C., Showers, B., & Murphy, J. (1989). School renewal as cultural change. Educational Leadership, 70-77.
Kemmis, S., & McTaggart, R. (1988). The action research planner. Geelong: Deakin University.
Lawrence, A., Anthony, G., & Ding, L. (2009). Teacher learning and pedagogical shifts subsequent to professional development experiences. New Zealand Journal of Teachers’ Work, 6(2), 136-147.
Leahy, S., Lyon, C., Thompson, M., & Wiliam, D. (2005). Classroom assessment: Minute by minute, day by day. Educational Leadership, 63(3), 18-24.
Lee, E. (2006). Making equity explicit: A PD model for new teacher mentors. In Achinstein, B. & Athanases, S.Z., Mentors in the making: developing new leaders for new teachers (pp. 55-68). New York: Teachers College Press.
Leinhardt, G., & Smith, D. (1985). Expertise in mathematics instruction: Subject matter knowledge. Journal of Educational Psychology, 78, 75-79.
Leitch, R., & Day, C. (2000). Action research and reflective practice: towards a holistic view. Educational Action Research, 8(1), 179-192.
Levine, T.H., & Marcus, A.S. (2010). How the structure and focus of teachers’ collaborative activities facilitate and constrain teacher learning. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26, 389-398.
Little, J.W. (2001). PD in pursuit of school reform. In Lieberman, A. & Miller, L., Teachers caught in the action: PD that matters (pp. 23-44). New York: Teachers College Press.
Loughran, J.J. (2002). Effective Reflective Practice: in search of meaning in learning about teaching. Journal of Teacher Education, 53(1), 33-43.
Lloyd, C.V. & Anders, P.L. (1994). Research-based practices as the content of staff development. In V. Richardson (Eds.), Teacher change and the PD process: A case in reading instruction (pp. 68-89). Columbia University: Teachers College Press.
Lytle, S. & Cochran-Smith, M. (1992). Teacher research as a way of knowing. Harvard Educational Review, 62(4), 446-474.
Marsick, V. and Watkins, K. (1990) Informal and incidental learning in the workplace. London, Routledge.
McIntosh, P. (2010). Action research and reflective practice: creative and visual method to facilitate reflection in learning. London: Routledge.
McKenzie, B., & Turbill, J. (1999, 27 November – 2 Disember). Professional development, classroom practice and student outcomes: exploring the connections in early literacy development. Paper presented at the AARE-NZARE Conference, Melbourne, Australia. Retrieved December 12, 2009, from http://www.aare.edu.au/99pap/mck99328.htm
McLeskey, J., & Waldron, N. (2004). Three conceptions of teacher learning: Exploring therelationship between knowledge and the practice of teaching. Teacher Education and Special Education, 27(1) 3-14.
McMahon, T. (1999). Is reflective practice synonymous with action research? Educational Action Research, 7(1), 163-169.
Medlin, J. Leask, B and Feast, V. (1999, November 1-2). Using reflective practice to modify teaching practices and improve outcomes for graduates. Paper presented at the University Conference Effective Courses/Effective Teaching, University of Quensland. Retrieved March 12, 2011, from http://www.tedi.uq.edu.au/conferences/teach_conference99/papers/Medlin.html
Merriam, S. and Caffarella (1991) Learning in Adulthood. A comprehensive guide. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Neuman, S.B., & Cunningham, L. (2009). The impact of professional development and coaching on early language and literacy instructional practices. American Educational Research Journal, 46(2), 532-566.
Noraini, I., Loh, S.C., Norjoharuddeen M.N., Ahmad Zabidi, A.R., & Rahimi, M.S. (2007). The professional preparation of Malaysian teachers in the implementation of teaching and learning of mathematics and science in English. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 3(2), 101-110.
Padwad, A., & Dixit, K.K. (2008). Impact of professional learning community participation on teachers’ thinking about classroom problems. TESL Electronic Journal, 12(3). Retrieved from http://www.cc.kyoto-su.ac.jp/information/tesl-ej/ej47/a10.html
Pajares, M.F. (1992). Teachers’ beliefs and educational research: Cleaning up a messy construct. Review of Educational Research, 62, 307-322.
Pajares, M.F. (1993). Preservice teachers’ beliefs: A focus for teacher education. Retrieved on September 28, 2009, from http://www.des.emory.edu/mfp/Pajares1993ATE.html
Penn-Edwards, S. (2010). The competencies of an English teacher: Beginning student teacher’s perceptions. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 35(2), 49-66.
Plummer, F. (2005, 27 November – 1 December). Learning together through action learning. Paper presented for Australian Association for Research in Education (AARE) Conference, University of Western Sydney, Australia. Retrieved March 15, 2011, from http://www.aare.edu.au/05pap/plu05266.pdf
Pow, J., & Yeung, S.W. (2007). A reflective-participating approach to professional development in teaching of Liberal Studies in schools. Hong Kong Teachers’ Centre Journal, 6, 16-29. Retrieved March 3, 2010, from http://edb.org.hk/HKTC/download/journal/j6/p016_029.pdf
Prime, G.M. & Miranda, R. J. (2006). Urban public high school teachers’ beliefs about science learner characteristics: Implications for curriculum. Urban Education, 41(5), 506-532.
Putnam, R.T., & Borko, H. (2000). What do new views of knowledge and thinking have to say about research on teacher learning? Educational Researcher, 29(1), 4-15.
Revans, R. (1980). The ABC of action learning. Bromley: Chartwell-Bratt.
Richards, J.C., Gallo, P. B., & Renandya, W. A. (2001). Exploring teachers' beliefs and the processes of change. PAC Journal, 1,1, 41-58.
Richardson, V. & Hamilton, M.L. (1994). The practical-argument PD process. In Richardson, V., Teacher change and the PD process: A case in reading instruction (pp. 109-134). New York: Teachers College Press.
Richardson, V. (2003). Preservice teachers’ beliefs. In J. Raths (Ed.), Teacher beliefs and classroom performance: The impact of teacher education (pp.1-22), Greenwich: Information Age Publishing.
Rogers, P. (2007). Teacher professional learning in mathematics: An example of a change process. In J. Watson, & K. Beswick (Eds.), Mathematics: Essential Research, Essential Practice. Paper presented at the 30th annual conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia, held at University of Tasmania, Hobart, 8-12 July (pp.631-640). Sydney: MERGA.
Saunders, W.M., Goldenberg, C.N., & Gallimore, R. (2009). Increasing achievement by focusing grade-level teams on improving classroom learning: A prospective, quasi-experimental study of title I schools. American Educational Research Journal, 46(4), 1006-1033.
Schon, D.A. (1987). Educating the reflective practitioner. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Schon, D.A. (1995). Teacher learning in the workplace: Implications for school reform. In T.R. Guskey & M. Huberman (Eds.), Professional development in education: New paradigms and practices (pp.92-113). New York: Teachers College Press.
Schon, D.A. (1996). Educating the reflective practitioner: Toward a new design for teaching and learning in the professions. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, Inc.
Schulman, L. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundation of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1-22.
Schulman, V., & Armitage, D. (2005). Project Discovery: An urban middle school reform effort. Education and Urban Society, 37(4), 371-397.
Serafini, F. (2002). Reflective practice and learning, Primary voices K-6. Urbana, 10(4), 2-10.
Serrat, O. (2009). Drawing mind maps. Retrieved February 12, 2011, from http://www.adb.org/documents/information/knowledge-solutions/drawing-mind-maps.pdf
Siti Khatijah, J. (2006). Mirrors for an ESL classroom: using reflective teaching to explore classroom practice and enhance professional growth. The English Teacher, 35, 99-116.
Stallings, J.A. (1989). School achievement effects and staff development: What are some critical factors? Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association.
Tabachnick, B., & Zeichner, K. (1984). The impact tof the student teaching experience on the development of teacher perspectives. Journal of Teacher Education, 21, 156-167.
Taylor, E.W. (2003). Attending graduate school in adult education and the impact on teaching beliefs: A longitudinal study. Journal of Transformative Education, 1(4), 349-367.
Thang, S.M., Hall, C., Hazita, A., & Joyes, G. (2010). Supporting smart school teachers’ continuing professional development in and through ICT: a model for change. International Journal of Education and Development using Information and Communication Technology, 6(2), 1-16.
Thomas, S.C., Kun, F.T.K., & Kun, S.T.K. (2007). Language policy, language teachers’ beliefs and classroom practices. Applied Linguistics, 29(3), 381-403.
Tobin, K., Tippin, D.J., & Gallard, A.J. (1994). Research on instructional strategies for teaching science. In D.L. Gabel (Ed.), Handbook of research on science teaching and learning. New York: National Science Teachers Association.
Tripp, D. (1993). Critical incidents in teaching. London: Routledge.
Vacilotto, S. and R. Cummings, (2007) Peer coaching in TEFL/TESL programmes. ELT Journal, 61 (2), 153-163.
Walkington,J. 2005. Becoming a teacher: encouraging development of teacher identity through reflective practice. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 33, 53-64.
Zakaria, Z., & Care, E. (2010). Resolving issues and concerns of ESL reading teachers through professional collaborative practices. In F.A. Majid & I.S. Ismail (Ed.), Reading on ESL: reading and writing instruction (pp.51-74). Shah Alam: University Publication Centre.
Zohar, A., Degani, A., & Vaakin, E. (2001). Teachers’ beliefs about low-achieving students and higher-order thinking. Teaching and Teacher Education, 17, 469-485.
UiTM Press (the Publisher) has agreed to publish the undersigned author’s paper in Idealogy Journal. The agreement is contingent upon the fulfilment of a number of requirements listed below.
1. The undersigned author warrants that the paper entitled below is original, that it is not in any way libellous or unlawful in Malaysia, that it does not infringe any copyright or other proprietary right. The undersigned hereby represents and warrants that he/she is the author of the paper, except for material that is clearly identified as to its original source, with permission notices from the copyright owners where required. The undersigned represents that he/she has the power and authority to sign and execute this agreement.
2. The undersigned author warrants that the paper entitled below has not been published elsewhere, and also it will not be submitted anywhere else for publication prior to acceptance/rejection by this Journal.
3. By submitting the paper entitled below, the undersigned author agrees to transfer the rights to publish and distribute the paper in an international e-journal (entitled above) to Publisher.
4. The undersigned author agrees to make a reasonable effort to conform to Publisher's submission guidelines and to liaise with the editor to ensure that the requirements of these guidelines are met to a reasonable degree.
5. The corresponding author signs for and accepts responsibility for releasing this material on behalf of any and all coauthors. This agreement is to be signed by at least one of the authors who has obtained the assent of the co-author(s) where applicable. After submission of this agreement signed by the corresponding author, changes of authorship or in the order of the authors listed will not be accepted.