Designing for Sustainability: Exploring the Intersection of Creative Arts in Digital Sustainable Ecology by Interactive Animation
Abstract
This article presents doctoral research examining the intersection of creative arts and sustainable development, focusing on interactive animation in the digital sustainable ecology. The research problem addressed is the sustainability of cultural creativity within the realm of digital media ecology, expanding the traditional understanding of ecological sustainability. The study objective aims to investigate the interplay between interactive animation, sustainable development, and digital cultural communication, exploring potential approaches for designing sustainability within interactive animation. The methodology involves drawing upon media ecology theory, conducting content analysis, and performing a comprehensive literature review and case study analysis. Findings indicate that interactive animation expresses frontage scientific concepts through artistic language, promoting cultural reflection and humanistic communication in the digital ecological environment. Interactive animation facilitates the collection of objective behavioural data, integrating scientific concepts into creative design and iterative research for sustainability. The research highlights the significance of creative arts in addressing challenges and opportunities associated with sustainable technology advancement. Exploring the intersection of creative arts and sustainable development by interactive animation, the study deepens participants' understanding of the art form and engages them in the realms of art and science. Implications include fostering cultural spectacle, promoting humanistic meditation, and integrating scientific concepts into creative design, ultimately contributing to sustainability in the digital ecological environment. Contributions involve providing insights into the potential of interactive animation as an academic research tool, expanding ecological sustainability understanding, and emphasizing the role of creative arts in advancing sustainable technology.
References
Nusselder, A. (2009). Interface fantasy: A Lacanian cyborg ontology. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.
Nystrom, C. L. (1974). Toward a Science of Media Ecology: The Formulation of Integrated Conceptual Paradigms for the Study of Human Communication Systems. [Ph.D., New York University]. https://www.proquest.com/docview/287996744/citation/F50F7B23A4244BB1PQ/1
Ouariachi, T., Li, C.-Y., & Elving, W. J. L. (2020). Gamification Approaches for Education and Engagement on Pro-Environmental Behaviors: Searching for Best Practices. Sustainability, 12(11), Article 11. doi: 10.3390/su12114565
Parikka, J. (2012). What is media archaeology? Cambridge, UK ; Malden, MA: Polity Press.
Postman, N. (2000). The Humanism of Media Ecology. Proceedings of the Media Ecology Association, 1(1), 10–16.
Rebentisch, J. (2015). The Contemporaneity of Contemporary Art. New German Critique, 42(1), 223–237. doi: 10.1215/0094033X-2753672
Robertson, G. G., Card, S. K., & Mackinlay, J. D. (1993). Information visualization using 3D interactive animation. Communications of the ACM, 36(4), 57–71. doi: 10.1145/255950.153577
Ruotsalainen, J., & Heinonen, S. (2015). Media ecology and the future ecosystemic society. European Journal of Futures Research, 3(1), 9. doi: 10.1007/s40309-015-0068-7
Saleh, R., & Brem, A. (2023). Creativity for sustainability: An integrative literature review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 388, 135848. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.135848
Schneider, C., & Betz, S. (2022). Transformation2: Making software engineering accountable for sustainability. Journal of Responsible Technology, 10, 100027. doi: 10.1016/j.jrt.2022.100027
Schneider, S. (2019). The Impacts of Digital Technologies on Innovating for Sustainability. In N. Bocken, P. Ritala, L. Albareda, & R. Verburg (Eds.), Innovation for Sustainability: Business Transformations Towards a Better World (pp. 415–433). Cham: Springer International Publishing. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-97385-2
Schramm, W. (1988). The story of human communication: Cave painting to microchip. New York: Harper & Row.
Scopigno, R., Callieri, M., Dellepiane, M., Ponchio, F., & Potenziani, M. (2017). Delivering and using 3D models on the web: Are we ready? Virtual Archaeology Review, 8(17), Article 17. doi: 10.4995/var.2017.6405
Seifert, U. (2008). Paradoxes of interactivity: Perspectives for media theory, human-computer interaction, and artistic investigations. In The Co-Evolution of Humans and Machines: A Paradox of Interactivity. Bielefeld: transcript.
Severance, C. (2014). Massimo Banzi: Building Arduino. Computer, 47(1), 11–12. doi: 10.1109/MC.2014.19
Sharp, H., Preece, J., & Rogers, Y. (2019). Interaction Design: Beyond Human-Computer Interaction (5th ed.). Indianapolis, IN: John Wiley and Sons. http://gen.lib.rus.ec/book/index.php?md5=c8831be96c280658b56799d28ea548d5
Skivko, M., Korneeva, E., & Korableva, O. (2021). From sustainable habits to sustainable energy use: Social sustainability in the context of digitization. E3S Web of Conferences, 250, 06002. doi: 10.1051/e3sconf/202125006002
Snow, C. P., & Collini, S. (2012). The two cultures. Cambridge, U.K. ; New York: Cambridge University Press.
Sparviero, S., & Ragnedda, M. (2021). Towards digital sustainability: The long journey to the sustainable development goals 2030. Digital Policy, Regulation and Governance, 23(3), 216–228. doi: 10.1108/DPRG-01-2021-0015
Statham, N. (2019). Scientific Rigour of Online Platforms for 3D Visualization of Heritage. Virtual Archaeology Review, 10(20), 1–16.
Sternberg, R. J., & Lubart, T. I. (1999). The Concept of Creativity: Prospects and Paradigms. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of Creativity (pp. 3–15). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511807916.003
Strate, L. (2004). A media ecology review. Communication Research Trends, 23(3), 3–48.
Strate, L. (2018). Media and protest: Technological change and cultural disturbance. Explorations in Media Ecology, 17(3), 231–245. doi: 10.1386/eme.17.3.231_1
Sutherland, I. E. (1963). Sketchpad: A man-machine graphical communication system [Massachusetts Institute of Technology]. https://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/techreports/UCAM-CL-TR-574.pdf
Teo, T. (2023, February 3). Visualizing Population Density Patterns in Six Countries. Visual Capitalist. https://www.visualcapitalist.com/cp/population-density-patterns-countries/
VanderWeele, T. J. (2015). Explanation in causal inference: Methods for mediation and interaction. New York: Oxford University Press.
Vervoort, J. M., Keuskamp, D. H., Kok, K., Van Lammeren, R., Stolk, T., Veldkamp, T. (A. ), Rekveld, J., Schelfhout, R., Teklenburg, B., Cavalheiro Borges, A., Jánoškóva, S., Wits, W., Assmann, N., Abdi Dezfouli, E., Cunningham, K., Nordeman, B., & Rowlands, H. (2014). A sense of change: Media designers and artists communicating about complexity in social-ecological systems. Ecology and Society, 19(3), art10. doi: 10.5751/ES-06613-190310
Wagner, R., & Kabalska, A. (2023). Sustainable value in the fashion industry: A case study of value construction/destruction using digital twins. Sustainable Development, 31(3), 1652–1667. doi: 10.1002/sd.2474
Watkins, J., & Russo, A. (2005). Digital cultural communication: Designing co-creative new media environments. Proceedings of the 5th Conference on Creativity & Cognition - C&C ’05, 144. doi: 10.1145/1056224.1056245
Xenakis, I., & Arnellos, A. (2013). The relation between interaction aesthetics and affordances. Design Studies, 34(1), 57–73. doi: 10.1016/j.destud.2012.05.004
Zayani, M. (2011). Media, cultural diversity and globalization: Challenges and opportunities. Journal of Cultural Diversity, 18(2), 48–54.
Zhao, J. (2016). Interactive Animation Design: Zbrush+Autodesk+Unity+Kinect+Arduino_3D MotionSensing Tech-Integration. In Chemical Industry Press. https://www.abebooks.com/Interactive-animation-design-Zbrush-Autodesk-Unity/18667156460/bd
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
UiTM Press (the Publisher) has agreed to publish the undersigned author’s paper in Idealogy Journal. The agreement is contingent upon the fulfilment of a number of requirements listed below.
1. The undersigned author warrants that the paper entitled below is original, that it is not in any way libellous or unlawful in Malaysia, that it does not infringe any copyright or other proprietary right. The undersigned hereby represents and warrants that he/she is the author of the paper, except for material that is clearly identified as to its original source, with permission notices from the copyright owners where required. The undersigned represents that he/she has the power and authority to sign and execute this agreement.
2. The undersigned author warrants that the paper entitled below has not been published elsewhere, and also it will not be submitted anywhere else for publication prior to acceptance/rejection by this Journal.
3. By submitting the paper entitled below, the undersigned author agrees to transfer the rights to publish and distribute the paper in an international e-journal (entitled above) to Publisher.
4. The undersigned author agrees to make a reasonable effort to conform to Publisher's submission guidelines and to liaise with the editor to ensure that the requirements of these guidelines are met to a reasonable degree.
5. The corresponding author signs for and accepts responsibility for releasing this material on behalf of any and all coauthors. This agreement is to be signed by at least one of the authors who has obtained the assent of the co-author(s) where applicable. After submission of this agreement signed by the corresponding author, changes of authorship or in the order of the authors listed will not be accepted.
