Systematic Literature Review On Infographic Adaptation And Acceptance Factors In Facilitating Teaching And Learning Across Higher Education And Medical Fields
Keywords:
Infographics, Higher Education, Visual Literacy, Medical Education, Systematic Literature ReviewAbstract
ABSTRACT
Infographics are visual representations of information designed for rapid understanding at a glance. As powerful stimulators of visual communication, infographics have gained significant popularity among educators in higher education and medical fields. The creation of engaging teaching and learning materials has become increasingly critical, yet systematic reviews focused on infographic acceptance and adaptation remain scarce. This study conducts a comprehensive systematic literature review adhering to the ROSES protocol (RepOrting standards for Systematic Evidence Syntheses), selecting studies from Scopus, Science Direct, and Google Scholar. A total of 19 empirical studies were included in the final synthesis. A thematic analysis revealed four main themes: (1) Clarity and Efficiency in Information Delivery; (2) Enhancing Comprehensibility; (3) Development of Visual Literacy Competencies; and (4) Promotion of Active Teaching and Learning Practices. The findings highlight the essential role of infographics in enhancing comprehension, promoting engagement, and facilitating the rapid transfer of knowledge, particularly in health-related education. This paper contributes meaningful insights into the role of infographics in teaching and learning while identifying key areas for future research and curriculum development.
Keywords: Infographics, Higher Education, Visual Literacy, Medical Education, Systematic Literature Review
References
Afify, M. K. (2018). The effect of the difference between infographic designing types (static vs
animated) on developing visual learning designing skills and recognition of its elements and principles. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET), 13(09), 204.
Alqudah, D., Bidin, A. B., & Hussin, M. A. (2019). The impact of educational infographic on
students’ interaction and perception in Jordanian Higher Education: Experimental Study. International Journal of Instruction, 12(4), 669–688. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2019.12443a
Baglama, B., Yucesoy, Y., Uzunboylu, H., & Ozcan, D. (2017). Can infographics facilitate the learning
of individuals with mathematical learning difficulties? International Journal of Cognitive Research in Science, Engineering and Education, 5(2), 119–127.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in
Psychology, 3(2), 77-101.
Charrois, T. L. (2015). Systematic reviews: What do you need to know to get started? The Canadian
Journal of Hospital Pharmacy, 68(2), 144.
Chicca, J., & Chunta, K. (2020). Engaging students with visual stories: Using infographics in nursing
education. Teaching and Learning in Nursing, 15(1), 32–36.
Darcy, R. (2019). Infographics, assessment and digital literacy: Innovating learning and teaching
through developing ethically responsible digital competencies in public health. Research Repository, 112.
Dunlap, J. C., & Lowenthal, P. R. (2016). Getting graphic about infographics: Design lessons learned
from popular infographics. Journal of Visual Literacy, 35(1), 42–59.
Fadzil, H. M. (2018). Designing infographics for the Educational Technology Course: Perspectives of
pre-service science teachers. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 17(1), 8–18.
Gusenbauer, M., & Haddaway, N. R. (2020). Which academic search systems are suitable for systematic
reviews or meta-analyses? Evaluating retrieval qualities of Google Scholar, PubMed, and 26 other resources. Research Synthesis Methods, 11(2), 181–217.
Haddaway, N. R., Collins, A. M., Coughlin, D., & Kirk, S. (2015). The role of Google Scholar
inevidence reviews and its applicability to grey literature searching. PloS one, 10(9), e0138237.
Haddaway, N. R., Macura, B., Whaley, P., & Pullin, A. S. (2018). ROSES Reporting standards for
Systematic Evidence Syntheses: Pro forma, flow-diagram and descriptive summary of the plan and conduct of environmental systematic reviews and systematic maps. Environmental Evidence, 7(1), 1-8.
Halevi, G., Moed, H., & Bar-Ilan, J. (2017). Suitability of Google Scholar as a source of scientific
information and as a source of data for scientific evaluation—Review of the literature. Journal of Informetrics, 11(3), 823-834.
Heimbürger, A., & Isomöttönen, V. (2019, October). Infographics as a reflective assignment method in
requirements engineering e-course?. In 2019 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE) (pp. 1-5). IEEE.
Hsiao, P. Y., Laquatra, I., Johnson, R. M., & Smolic, C. E. (2018). Using infographics to teach the
evidence analysis process to senior undergraduate students. Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics, 119(1), 26-30.
Jaleniauskiene, E., & Kasperiuniene, J. (2022). Infographics in higher education: A scoping review. E-
Learning and Digital Media, 20427530221107774.
Jaleniauskiene, E., & Kasperiuniene, J. (2022). Visual literacy development through infographics. In
European Conference on Information Literacy (pp. 189-200). Springer, Cham.
Kitchenham, B. A. (2012, September). Systematic review in software engineering: Where we are and
where we should be going. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Workshop on Evidential Assessment of Software Technologies (pp. 1-2).
Kitchenham, B., Brereton, O. P., Budgen, D., Turner, M., Bailey, J., & Linkman, S. (2009). Systematic
literature reviews in software engineering–a systematic literature review. Information and Software Technology, 51(1), 7-15.
Martin, L. J., Turnquist, A., Groot, B., Huang, S. Y., Kok, E., Thoma, B., & van Merriënboer, J. J.
(2019). Exploring the role of infographics for summarizing medical literature. Health Professions Education, 5(1), 48-57.
Martin-Martin, A., Orduna-Malea, E., Thelwall, M., & López-Cózar, E. D. (2018). Google Scholar,
Web of Science, and Scopus: A systematic comparison of citations in 252 subject categories. Journal of Informetrics, 12(4), 1160-1177.
Moher, D. (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA
statement. Annals of Internal Medicine, 151(4), 264.
Naparin, H., & Saad, A. B. (2017). Infographics in education: Review on infographics design. The
International Journal of Multimedia & Its Applications (IJMA), 9(4), 5.
Okoli, C. (2015). A guide to conducting a standalone systematic literature review. Communications of
the Association for Information Systems, 37(1), 43.
Ozdamlı, F., Kocakoyun, S., Sahin, T., & Akdag, S. (2016). Statistical reasoning of impact of
infographics on education. Procedia Computer Science, 102, 370-377.
Parveen, A., & Husain, N. (2021). Infographics as a promising tool for teaching and learning.
Patino, C. M., & Ferreira, J. C. (2018). Inclusion and exclusion criteria in research studies: Definitions
and why they matter. Jornal Brasileiro de Pneumologia, 44, 84-84.
Rahim, N. N., Khidzir, N. Z., Yusof, A. M., & Saidin, A. Z. (2016). An assessment of quality on
animated infographics in an Islamic context. In Proceedings 2016 IEEE International Conference on Teaching and Learning in Education (ICTLE 2016).
Ramlie, M. K., Abdul Rahaman, A., Ahmad, A. K. A., & Abdullah, M. (2023). Inovasi Kaedah
Pembelajaran: Perkembangan Penggunaan Teknologi Dalam Institusi Pendidikan. Idealogy Journal, 8(1), 94–103. https://doi.org/10.24191/idealogy.v8i1.407
Savini, C. A., Gasull, V. L., & Gimeno, P. B. (2019, March). INFOGRAPHICS. A way to increase
competences. In 2019 IEEE World Conference on Engineering Education (EDUNINE) (pp. 1-6). IEEE.
Seehra, J., Pandis, N., Koletsi, D., & Fleming, P. S. (2016). Use of quality assessment tools in systematic
reviews was varied and inconsistent. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 69, 179-184.
Shaffril, H. A. M., Ahmad, N., Samsuddin, S. F., Samah, A. A., & Hamdan, M. E. (2020). Systematic
literature review on adaptation towards climate change impacts among indigenous people in the Asia Pacific regions. Journal of Cleaner Production, 258, 120595.
Trabuco, L., Pandian, H., Nikiphorou, E., & Gupta, L. (2022). Designing infographics: Visual
representations for enhancing education, communication, and scientific research. Journal of Korean Medical Science, 37(27). https://doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2022.37.e214
Wanden-Berghe, C., & Sanz-Valero, J. (2012). Systematic reviews in nutrition: Standardized
methodology. British Journal of Nutrition, 107(S2), S3-S7.
Xiao, Y., & Watson, M. (2019). Guidance on conducting a systematic literature review. Journal of
Planning Education and Research, 39(1), 93-112.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 UiTM Press
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
UiTM Press (the Publisher) has agreed to publish the undersigned author’s paper in Idealogy Journal. The agreement is contingent upon the fulfilment of a number of requirements listed below.
1. The undersigned author warrants that the paper entitled below is original, that it is not in any way libellous or unlawful in Malaysia, that it does not infringe any copyright or other proprietary right. The undersigned hereby represents and warrants that he/she is the author of the paper, except for material that is clearly identified as to its original source, with permission notices from the copyright owners where required. The undersigned represents that he/she has the power and authority to sign and execute this agreement.
2. The undersigned author warrants that the paper entitled below has not been published elsewhere, and also it will not be submitted anywhere else for publication prior to acceptance/rejection by this Journal.
3. By submitting the paper entitled below, the undersigned author agrees to transfer the rights to publish and distribute the paper in an international e-journal (entitled above) to Publisher.
4. The undersigned author agrees to make a reasonable effort to conform to Publisher's submission guidelines and to liaise with the editor to ensure that the requirements of these guidelines are met to a reasonable degree.
5. The corresponding author signs for and accepts responsibility for releasing this material on behalf of any and all coauthors. This agreement is to be signed by at least one of the authors who has obtained the assent of the co-author(s) where applicable. After submission of this agreement signed by the corresponding author, changes of authorship or in the order of the authors listed will not be accepted.
