Identifying Features in Studio Lighting Tutorial Videos for Photography Education

Authors

  • Muhamad Adam Hanif Che Saad Faculty of Art and Design Universiti Teknologi MARA, Seri Iskandar Campus, Perak, Malaysia
  • Balqis Nabilah Ramanizan School of AI Computing & Multimedia, Lincoln University College, Kelana Jaya, Selangor, Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24191/idealogy.v11i1.833

Keywords:

Studio Lighting, Video Tutorial,, Content Analysis, Visual Learning, Photography Education

Abstract

The shift from print-based to time-based learning has been more intense in the modern era, accelerated particularly by the Covid-19 pandemic. Online and flexible modes of learning demanded an educational shift from the traditional printed word to electronic and online media. The purpose of this research is to identify key features used in studio lighting tutorial videos that enhance the learning experience of photography students. It focuses on how video tutorials can effectively deliver practical knowledge in photography. 

A content analysis method was employed on 20 YouTube videos related to studio lighting tutorials. Nine critical features were identified which is typography and text, video duration, language, lighting condition, audio and narration, instructor presence, graphic elements, shot variety, and equipment demonstration. These features were consistently used across the most engaging and informative videos. 

The findings suggest that a well structured visual content plays a crucial role in improving comprehension and attention among students, particularly in subjects requiring practical demonstration. The result serves as guidelines for educators and video creators to develop more effective instructional videos, especially in creative and visual fields such as photography. 

Keywords: Studio Lighting, Video tutorial, Photography Education, Content Analysis, Visual Learning 

References

Brame, C. J. (2016). Effective educational videos: Principles and guidelines for maximizing student learning from video content. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 15(4), es6.

Carmichael, M., Reid, A.-K., & Karpicke, J. D. (2017). Assessing the Impact of Educational Video on Student Engagement, Critical Thinking and Learning: The Current State of Play. Educational Media International, 54(3), 207-225.

Clark, R. C., & Mayer, R. E. (2011). E-learning and the science of instruction: Proven guidelines for consumers and designers of multimedia learning (3rd ed.). Pfeiffer.

Fiorella, L., & Mayer, R. E. (2016). Eight ways to promote generative learning. Educational Psychology Review, 28(4), 717–741.

Guo, P. J., Kim, J., & Rubin, R. (2014). How video production affects student engagement: An empirical study of MOOC videos. In Proceedings of the first ACM conference on Learning@ scale conference (pp. 41–50).

Mayer, R. E. (2005). The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning. Cambridge University Press.

Seemiller, C., & Grace, M. (2017). Generation Z: Educating and engaging the next generation of students. Jossey-Bass.

Nasruddin, A.N., Mohamed Ghazali, N.A. and Che Din, S. (2024) ‘Exploring the usage of motion graphic elements in projection mapping video to promote agrotourism in Malaysia’, Idealogy Journal, 9(2). doi:10.24191/idealogy.v9i2.564.

Sulaiman, M. Z., Nasiruddin, M. A., & Abdul, A. (2017). An Investigation Of Video Tutorial Criteria For Studio Lighting Course. International Journal of Creative Multimedia, 2(1), 21–34.

Downloads

Published

2026-04-01

Most read articles by the same author(s)