Empowering Nagari Through Diaspora: The Collective Capital of Minangkabau Migrant Organisations

Authors

  • Nelmawarni Adab dan Humanities Faculty, UIN Imam Bonjol Padang, Indonesia
  • Warnis Rasyidin BRIN National Research and Innovation Agency of Indonesia
  • Lailatur Rahmi UIN Imam Bonjol Padang
  • Ulfatmi Postgraduate Program, UIN Imam Bonjol Padang
  • Khilal Syauqi Adab dan Humanities Faculty, UIN Imam Bonjol Padang, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24191/idealogy.v10i2.875

Abstract

This article analyzes the role of Minangkabau diaspora organisations as collective actors in empowering nagari (indigenous villages) in West Sumatra. The deeply rooted merantau (outmigration) tradition in Minangkabau culture has fostered expansive social and cultural networks that have evolved into institutionalised diaspora organisations. Employing a qualitative case study approach, this research draws on in-depth interviews, participant observation, and document analysis of organisations such as IKSP, PKDP, and S3. Findings reveal that these organisations maintain strong institutional frameworks and efficiently manage collective capital, encompassing social, cultural, and economic resources. This capital is mobilised through participatory and transparent development programs rooted in musyawarah nagari (local deliberative councils), focusing on infrastructure, education, productive economy, and cultural preservation. The programs reflect not only community-driven development but are also deeply informed by Minangkabau customary values and Islamic principles. The study concludes that Minangkabau diaspora organisations serve as strategic transnational actors in local development. Their contributions extend beyond financial remittances to embody social piety and collective agency. The article offers a theoretical contribution to diaspora-led development discourse, highlighting the relevance of institutionalised gotong royong (mutual cooperation) within localised governance systems. 

Keywords: Minangkabau, diaspora, migrant.  

 

References

Adeola, G., & Evans, M. (2020). Social capital and diaspora engagement in community development: Evidence from sub-Saharan Africa. Development in Practice, 30(7), 921–932. https://doi.org/10.1080/09614524.2020.1784533

Bappeda Sumbar. (2022). Laporan tahunan pembangunan nagari di Sumatera Barat. Padang: Bappeda Provinsi Sumatera Barat.

Brandhorst, R., Heins, V., & Müller, A. (2020). The new philanthropy: Transnational diasporic engagement and local development. Geoforum, 109, 74–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2020.01.009

Bourdieu, P. (1986). The forms of capital. In J. G. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education (pp. 241–258). Greenwood Press.

Brinkerhoff, J. M. (2022). Institutionalizing diaspora philanthropy for development: Frameworks and best practices. Migration Studies, 10(1), 35–53. https://doi.org/10.1093/migration/mnz056

Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Eliza, A., & Pratama, R. (2019). Diaspora dan pembangunan: Studi kasus peran Minang rantau dalam Gebu Minang. Jurnal Sosial dan Humaniora, 8(1), 112–127. https://doi.org/10.30651/jsh.v8i1.2302

Granovetter, M. (1985). Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology, 91(3), 481–510. https://doi.org/10.1086/228311

Johnson, P. D. (2007). Diaspora philanthropy: Influences, initiatives, and issues. The Philanthropic Initiative & The Global Equity Initiative, Harvard University. https://web.archive.org/web/20190907024843/http://tpi.org/sites/default/files/pdf/Diaspora%20Philanthropy%20Initiative%20Harvard.pdf

Levitt, P. (1998). Social remittances: Migration driven local-level forms of cultural diffusion. International Migration Review, 32(4), 926–948. https://doi.org/10.1177/019791839803200404

Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. SAGE Publications.

Marta, R. F. (2014). Budaya merantau dan konstruksi identitas sosial orang Minangkabau. Jurnal Antropologi Indonesia, 35(2), 167–176.

Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.

Naim, M. (1979). Merantau ke kota: Studi tentang pola migrasi suku Minangkabau. Gadjah Mada University Press.

Nelmawarni. (2018). Tradisi merantau dan kesalehan sosial Minangkabau. UIN Imam Bonjol Press.

Nelmawarni, Warnis, Ulfatmi, & Noviyanty, H. (2023). Remitansi sebagai kesalehan sosial orang Minang: Mencari kontribusi perantau terhadap pembangunan Ranah Minang. Jurnal Multikultural dan Multireligius, 22(2). https://doi.org/10.32488/harmoni.v22i2.722

Portes, A., Escobar, C., & Walton, R. (2007). Immigrant transnational organizations and development: A comparative study. International Migration Review, 41(1), 242–281. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-7379.2007.00061.x

Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. Simon & Schuster.

Rubin, H. J., & Rubin, I. S. (2011). Qualitative interviewing: The art of hearing data (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.

Sampson, R. J., Raudenbush, S. W., & Earls, F. (1997). Neighborhoods and violent crime: A multilevel study of collective efficacy. Science, 277(5328), 918–924. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.277.5328.918

World Bank. (2003). Community-driven development in the context of conflict-affected countries: Challenges and opportunities. Social Development Department, World Bank. https://documents.worldbank.org/en/publication/documents-reports/documentdetail/735091468779431407

Van der Have, R., & Rubalcaba, L. (2021). Community-based innovation in diaspora organizations: A framework for inclusive development. Innovation and Development, 11(3), 391–408. https://doi.org/10.1080/2157930X.2020.1827717

Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Downloads

Published

2025-09-01