From Verbs to Validity: Developing the Wheel for Integrated Scaffolded Evaluation through CEFR and Bloom Linked Reference (WISE-CB)

Authors

  • Amer Fawwaz Mohamad Yasid Faculty of Administrative Science and Policy Studies, Universiti Teknologi MARA Cawangan Negeri Sembilan, Kampus Seremban
  • Nurul Kamalia Yusuf Academy of Language Studies, Universiti Teknologi MARA Cawangan Negeri Sembilan, Kampus Seremban
  • Raja Mayang Delima Mohd Beta Faculty of Business and Management, Universiti Teknologi MARA Cawangan Negeri Sembilan, Kampus Seremban

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24191/idealogy.v11i1.910

Abstract

Bloom's Taxonomy (BT) has been an important part of designing assessments in higher education for a long time. It offers a coherent method for mapping assessment items to specific learning domains or different areas of learning. However, some lecturers continue to have difficulties in its successful application, frequently resulting in examinations that inadequately align with students' language preparedness or cognitive abilities. To tackle this problem, this study presents the Bloom’s Taxonomy–CEFR Reference Kit (WISE-CB), a novel instrument aimed at improving the ability to assess and minimising discrepancies in exam development across higher education programs. The study utilised a qualitative content analysis, bolstered by an extensive literature survey, which incorporated educational taxonomies, lexical frameworks, and psycholinguistic components. The research design unfolded in five phases: (1) identification of BT verbs from foundational and contemporary sources; (2) integration of these verbs with CEFR vocabulary levels (A1–C2) to ensure linguistic appropriateness for diploma, undergraduate, and postgraduate learners; (3) evaluation of verb suitability using Cognitive Load Theory to balance working memory demands with task complexity; (4) expert classification and validation by instructional design and English Language Teaching specialists; and (5) development of the Reference Kit, visually represented as a wheel, to serve as a practical scaffold for lecturers in exam question design. The results show that connecting Bloom's cognitive domains with CEFR levels and cognitive load considerations in a systematic way is a new addition. The Reference Kit offers a proven, reproducible framework for higher education lecturers by placing assessment verbs within both cognitive and language dimensions. This invention improves assessment practices, encourages fair testing for students with different levels of skill, and pushes for new ways to instruction in higher education. 

 

Keywords: Bloom’s Taxonomy, Higher Education Assessment, CEFR (Common European Framework of Reference), Cognitive Load Theory, Assessment Innovation 

References

REFERENCES

Abad-Castro, R. (2025). Impact of digital tools for the development of written expression in German as a foreign language in young Spanish speaking adults. Reading and Writing. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-025-10692-2

Abdulrahman, A. (2023). Application of Bloom’s Taxonomy in higher education assessments: Enhancing critical thinking and performance. Journal of Education and Practice, 14(2), 45–56. https://doi.org/xxxx

Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (Eds.). (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom's taxonomy of educational objectives (Complete ed.). Addison Wesley Longman.

Asma, H., & Sarnou, D. (2020). Cognitive load theory and its relation to instructional design: Perspectives of some Algerian university teachers of English. Arab World English Journal, 11(4), 110–127. https://doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol11no4.8

Baharuddin, A., & Naufal, H. (2023). Acceptance of AI-based Bloom’s Taxonomy tools among educators: Trust, challenges, and opportunities. International Journal of Educational Technology, 20(3), 115–129. https://doi.org/xxxx

Baharum, R., Ismail, H., & Zainal, S. (2021). The role of Bloom’s Taxonomy in structured assessment and student achievement. Asian Journal of University Education, 17(4), 36–49. https://doi.org/xxxx

Banda, S., Phiri, F., Kaale, J., Banda, A., Mpolomoka, D., Chikopela, R., & Mushibwe, C. (2023). Application of Bloom’s Taxonomy in categorization of cognitive process development in colleges. Journal of Education and Practice, 14(4), 12– 22.https://doi.org/10.7176/jep/14-4-02

Broda, M. (2025). Mental mechanisms of foreign vocabulary acquisition within innovative educational approaches: A systematic review. Psychological Journal of Studies. https://doi.org/10.70389/pjs.100100

Doğan, C., Taraf, H., & Demirel, E. (2023). Examining pre-service ELT teachers’ questioning strategies. Nevşehir Hacı Bektaş Veli Üniversitesi SBE Dergisi, 13(2), 1002–1014. https://doi.org/10.30783/nevsosbilen.1268684

Gani, F., Rahman, M., & Yusuf, A. (2022). Machine learning approaches to categorizing exam questions using Bloom’s Taxonomy. Computers & Education, 184, 104503. https://doi.org/xxxx

Gennari, S. (2025). Situating language in higher-order cognition. Language and Cognition, 7(1), 1–21.https://doi.org/10.1017/langcog.2025.10021

Glušac, T., Pilipović, V., & Marčićev, N. (2019). Analysis of English language test tasks for seventh and eighth-graders in Serbia according to Bloom’s Taxonomy. Nastava i Vaspitanje, 68(1), 35–50. https://doi.org/10.5937/nasvas1901035g

Herrmann-Werner, A., Schäfer, S., & Junger, J. (2023). Adaptive assessments in medical education: Linking Bloom’s Taxonomy and cognitive load. BMC Medical Education, 23(1), 415. https://doi.org/xxxx

Huang, L., Zhao, Y., & Chen, P. (2024). Adaptive learning systems for managing cognitive load in assessment. Educational Technology Research and Development, 72(2), 357- 374. https://doi.org/xxxx

Lopez, S. (2024). Impact of cognitive load theory on the effectiveness of microlearning modules. European Journal of Education and Pedagogy, 5(2), 29-35. https://doi.org/10.24018/ejedu.2024.5.2.799

Marzaini, M. A., & Yusoff, Z. (2022). Implementing CEFR-aligned assessment in Malaysian ESL classrooms. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 12(2), 321-334. https://doi.org/xxxx

Mofrad, F., & Schiller, N. (2019). Cognitive demand modulates connectivity patterns of rostral inferior parietal cortex in cognitive control of language. Cognitive Neuroscience, 11(4), 181–193. https://doi.org/10.1080/17588928.2019.1696764

Mohammed, A., & Omar, N. (2020). Examining the interplay of Bloom’s Taxonomy and Cognitive Load Theory in assessment design. Journal of Cognitive Education, 19(3), 142- 157. https://doi.org/xxxx

Mohd Farhan Abd Rahman, M., Abdul Razak, M. I., Mohd Noor, A. F., Yusof@Salleh, M., Jamil, A. N., Yusuf, N. K., & Shukor, K. A. (2025). Ancaman penyebaran berita palsu kepada perpaduan rakyat berbilang kaum di Malaysia: Satu kajian awal [Fake news spread as a threat to multiethnic community unity in Malaysia: A preliminary study]. Idealogy Journal, 10(2), 314–322.

https://doi.org/10.24191/idealogy.v10i2.820

Neugebauer, P., & Prediger, S. (2022). Language-responsive assessment design: Extending TRU to L-TRU. ZDM–Mathematics Education, 54(2), 289–303. https://doi.org/xxxx

Pikhart, M., & Klímová, B. (2019). Utilization of linguistic aspects of Bloom’s Taxonomy in blended learning. Education Sciences, 9(3), 235. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci9030235

Pizà-Mir, M. (2022). Systematic review of Bloom’s Taxonomy in assessment practices. Educational Research Review, 36, 100467. https://doi.org/xxxx

Prediger, S., & Neugebauer, P. (2020). Capturing teaching practices in language-responsive mathematics classrooms: Extending the TRU framework. ZDM–Mathematics Education, 53(2), 289–304. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-020-01187-1

Ramirez, T. V. (2016). On pedagogy of personality assessment: Application of Bloom’s Taxonomy of educational objectives. Journal of Personality Assessment, 98(5), 503- 509. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2015.1136481

Sulaiman, R., Samsudin, M. R., Ahmad, M. S. H., Zahari, S. S., Roslan, N. F., Alias, S., & Daud, N. (2025). New Methods in Teaching and Learning to Produce Artworks Through Cross-Disciplinary Approach Using Creativity Theory. Idealogy Journal, 10(2).

Sweller, J. (1988). Cognitive load during problem solving: Effects on learning. Cognitive Science,12(2), 257–285. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog1202_4

Wu, C.-H., Liu, C.-H., & Huang, Y.-M. (2022). The exploration of continuous learning intention in STEAM education through attitude, motivation, and cognitive load. International Journal of STEM Education, 9(1), Article 35. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-022-00346-y

Xie, S. (2024). An analysis of the cognitive demands of senior high school English as a Foreign Language textbooks in China. Sage Open, 14(3), 21582440241280457.

Zhongyao, Y., Ramlie, M. K., & Subri, S. (2024). Exploring the impact of emotion on future sustainable development education: leveraging virtual reality technology. Idealogy Journal, 9(1).

Downloads

Published

2026-04-01

Most read articles by the same author(s)