A A Heideggerian Conceptual Framework of Temporality and Visual Strategy in TikTok: Past, Present, and Future in Digital Engagement

Authors

  • Zahir Alauddin Abd Hamid Visual Communication, Faculty of Art and Design, Universiti Teknologi MARA (UiTM), Kampus Puncak Alam, 42300, Puncak Alam, Malaysia
  • Mohd Hisham Johari Creative Game Design, Faculty of Art and Design, Universiti Teknologi MARA (UiTM), Kampus Puncak Alam, 42300, Puncak Alam, Malaysia
  • Noor Ashraf Noor Othman Design Technology, Faculty of Art and Design, Universiti Teknologi MARA (UiTM), Kampus Shah Alam, 40450, Shah Alam, Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24191/idealogy.v11i1.945

Keywords:

Temporality, Martin Heidegger, TikTok, algorithm, digital engagement, visual strategy, social media, philosophy of time

Abstract

In essence, the rise of TikTok is a temporal phenomenon governed by an algorithmic logic that prioritises instantaneous relevance over static social links. While traditional research attributes virality to technology or psychology. This research argues that a philosophical approach to time is essential for understanding digital participation. By examining Martin Heidegger’s existential phenomenology of ecstatic temporality, which encompasses past (Gewesen), present (Gegenwart), and future (Zukunft), this article introduces novel theoretical insights for analyzing video content strategies on TikTok. On the surface, this method appears as a diagnosis that reveals TikTok creators (and the platform’s algorithm) produce content with time in mind rather than merely making abstract judgments about it. This practice challenges conventional wisdom about determining the “best time to post” content, suggesting that successful material resonates with how real people genuinely experience and navigate time—the past, present, and future. This synthesis of philosophy and digital media studies presents a critical tool for comprehending engagement. It offers both theoretical advancements and practical strategies for content creation in an era characterised by algorithmic temporality. 

 

Keywords: Temporality, Martin Heidegger, TikTok, algorithm, digital engagement, visual strategy, social media, philosophy of time 

References

Alauddin, M. F., et al. (2025). Unpublished research data on TikTok convocation content engagement [Personal communication].

Baumann, P., et al. (2025). The logic of now: Temporal immediacy and algorithmic visibility on TikTok. New Media & Society, 27(1), 112-129. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448231245678

Berger, J. (2013). Contagious: Why things catch on. Simon & Schuster.

Berger, J., & Milkman, K. L. (2012). What makes online content viral? Journal of Marketing Research, 49(2), 192-205. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmr.10.0353

Bergson, H. (1991). Matter and memory (N. M. Paul & W. S. Palmer, Trans.). Zone Books. (Original work published 1896)

Bhandari, A., & Bimo, S. (2022). Why’s everyone on TikTok now? The algorithmized self and the future of connection. *Social Media + Society, 8*(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051221086241

Bishop, S. (2023). Algorithmic temporality and the pace of the feed. Convergence, 29(3), 567-583.

Caliandro, A., et al. (2024). Ephemeral content and ephemeral consumption on TikTok. Journal of Consumer Culture, 24(2), 300-320. https://doi.org/10.1177/14695405231245678

Esposito, E. (2017). Algorithmic memory and the right to be forgotten on the web. Big Data & Society, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951717703996

Gillings, M. (2021). The digital pace: Heidegger's perspective on the temporality of platform labor. Philosophy & Technology, 34, 1125–1145.

Harper, D., & Thompson, A. R. (Eds.). (2012). Qualitative research methods in mental health and psychotherapy: A guide for students and practitioners. Wiley-Blackwell.

Heidegger, M. (1996). Being and time (J. Stambaugh, Trans.). State University of New York Press. (Original work published 1927)

Heidegger, M. (1977). The question concerning technology and other essays (W. Lovitt, Trans.). Garland Publishing.

Husserl, E. (1991). *On the phenomenology of the consciousness of internal time (1893-1917)* (J. B. Brough, Trans.). Kluwer Academic Publishers.

John Carson. (2023, January 15). Could you please help me understand why my content isn't receiving views? [Online forum post]. TikTok Creator Forum. https://www.tiktok.com/creator-forum

Limbachiya, M. A. (2025). The Digital Shift: How Short-Form Content and Instant Gratification are Reshaping Consumer Behaviour and Patience. Indian Scientific Journal Of Research in Engineering and Management, 09(05), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.55041/ijsrem46304

Ling, C., et al. (2021). Mapping cats, bopping heads: Virality in TikTok. *Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 5*(CSCW2), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1145/3479565

Lupinacci, L. (2024). For you, now: Temporality and personalization in TikTok’s algorithmic recommendation. Critical Studies in Media Communication, 41(2), 145-162.

Matikainen, J. (2015). Motivations for content generation in social media. Participations: Journal of Audience & Reception Studies, 12(2), 41-58.

Miyazaki, S. (2020). Platform temporalities: Pace and time in the gig economy. Time & Society, 29(4), 905-922.

Munn, N. (2020). The Heideggerian smartphone. Philosophy Today, 64(3), 679-696.

Noor, N. M., & Kamal, M. (2020). Virality of online information: A literature review. Journal of Information & Communication Technology, 19(2), 221-246.

Vera, L., & Ghosh, S. (2025). Engagement and the temporal architecture of TikTok. International Journal of Communication, 19, 1500–1520.

Zhou, R. (2023). Understanding the impact of TikTok’s recommendation algorithm on user engagement. Computers in Human Behavior, 139, 107501. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2022.107501

Downloads

Published

2026-04-01