Design Deficiencies in Campus Communal Spaces: Barriers to Student Interaction and Well-being
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24191/idealogy.v10i2.843Abstract
Communal spaces in Malaysian public universities play a vital role in fostering social interaction, informal learning, relaxation, and a strong sense of belonging among students. This study aimed to assess students' perceptions of design deficiencies in communal spaces and their impact on the campus experience across selected UiTM campuses in Malaysia. A total of 110 respondents from Universiti Teknologi MARA Perak, Kedah, Pulau Pinang, and Puncak Alam participated in the research. Data was collected through a survey questionnaire distributed via Google Form, allowing students to express their views on the quality and usability of communal spaces within their campuses. The results indicate that the majority of students recognize the importance of well-designed communal spaces. This underscores the urgent need for improvements in campus communal space design to better support student engagement and enhance the overall campus environment. The study contributes to the discourse on campus planning by emphasizing the need for intentional, inclusive, and identity-driven communal environments. It offers practical insights for architects, planners, and university administrators to strengthen place identity, student belonging, and institutional character in higher education settings.
Keywords: Communal Space, Design Deficiencies, Students Perceptions, Public Universities
References
Abdullah, N., & Tan, H. (2022). Adapting campus lounges for collaborative learning in Malaysian higher education. Malaysian Journal of Learning Environments, 9(1), 41–58.
Ahmed, S. (2020). Decolonising campus geographies: Race and space in higher education. Routledge.
Ariffin, R., Hashim, M., & Ishak, N. (2020). Outdoor campus spaces and student comfort in tropical climates. Malaysian Journal of Environmental Design, 12(2), 41–53.
Boomsma, C., et al. (2017). Fear of crime in university campuses: Environmental and social factors. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 51, 200–210.
Browning, W. D., Ryan, C. O., & Clancy, J. O. (2014). 14 Patterns of Biophilic Design: Improving Health and Well-Being in the Built Environment. Terrapin Bright Green.
Comunian, R., & Gilmore, A. (2015). Beyond the Creative Campus: Reflections on the evolving relationship between higher education and the creative economy. King's College London.
Coulson, J., Roberts, P., & Taylor, I. (2010). University planning and architecture: The search for perfection. Routledge.
Garcia, M., et al. (2023). Ergonomics and student engagement: A design anthropology approach. Journal of Learning Spaces, 12(1), 22–37.
Hashim, M., Ariffin, R., & Ishak, N. (2019). Underutilized green spaces and student disengagement in Malaysian universities. Asian Journal of Campus Planning, 8(1), 51–63.
Hassan, N. A., et al. (2021). Retrofitting communal spaces in tropical university campuses: A case study of Universiti Malaya. Journal of Sustainable Architecture, 14(3), 77–91.
Higgins, S., & Hall, E. (2022). The ergonomics of belonging: Designing for campus communities. Environment and Behavior, 54(5), 789–819.
Hunley, S., & Schaller, M. (2009). Assessing learning spaces. New Directions for Student Services, 2009(125), 19–30.
Imrie, R. (2020). Designing for disability: Justice, embodiment and the place of access. Routledge.
Jensen, M. A., & Nielsen, T. (2023). Shaping student well-being through landscape architecture: Evidence from University of Copenhagen. Environmental Design Journal, 15(1), 21–36.
Kenney, D. R., Dumont, R., & Kenney, G. A. (2005). Mission and place: Strengthening learning and community through campus design. Greenwood Publishing Group.
Knez, I. (2005). Attachment and identity as related to a place and its perceived climate. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 25(2), 207–218.
Kumar, S. (2024). Decolonizing campus spaces: Student agency and authentic representation. Journal of Educational Architecture, 15(1), 45–60.
Lee, A., & Martinez, R. (2022). Collaborative space use and student learning: Lessons from campus case studies. Journal of Learning Environments Research, 13(4), 103–118.
Lim, Y. S., Tan, M. A., & Hanafiah, R. (2023). Design dissatisfaction in Malaysian campus communal spaces. International Journal of Built Environment and Sustainability, 10(1), 59–72.
MOHE. (2023). Malaysia Higher Education Statistics 2023. Ministry of Higher Education.
Oldenburg, R. (1999). The great good place: Cafés, coffee shops, bookstores, bars, hair salons and other hangouts at the heart of a community. Marlowe & Company.
Pallasmaa, J. (2005). The eyes of the skin: Architecture and the senses. Wiley.
Relph, E. (1976). Place and placelessness. Pion.
Smith, L., & Foley, R. (2022). Co-designing campus futures: Student participation in spatial planning. Higher Education Research & Development, 41(5), 1623–1638.
Souter, G., et al. (2011). Campus ecology and the learning landscape. University of Melbourne Press.
Spencer, C., & Marschall, M. (2020). Beyond tokenism: Meaningful Indigenous inclusion in higher education. Australian Journal of Indigenous Education, 49(1), 8–17.
Temple, P. (2008). Learning spaces in higher education: An under-researched topic. London Review of Education, 6(3), 229–241.
Temple, P. (2014). The physical university: Contours of space and place in higher education. Routledge.
Thomas, L., et al. (2020). Alienation in generic spaces: Campus design and student disengagement. Journal of Urban Design, 25(6), 780–799.
Turgut, H., & Yigit, E. (2019). Outdoor spatial quality and student behavior. Journal of Architectural Research, 14(2), 51–65.
UNESCO. (2022). Inclusive campus design: Global guidelines for equity in learning environments. UNESCO Publishing.
Woolner, P., et al. (2022). Sound and learning: A research trajectory. Journal of Educational Change, 23(3), 381–399.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 UiTM Press
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
UiTM Press (the Publisher) has agreed to publish the undersigned author’s paper in Idealogy Journal. The agreement is contingent upon the fulfilment of a number of requirements listed below.
1. The undersigned author warrants that the paper entitled below is original, that it is not in any way libellous or unlawful in Malaysia, that it does not infringe any copyright or other proprietary right. The undersigned hereby represents and warrants that he/she is the author of the paper, except for material that is clearly identified as to its original source, with permission notices from the copyright owners where required. The undersigned represents that he/she has the power and authority to sign and execute this agreement.
2. The undersigned author warrants that the paper entitled below has not been published elsewhere, and also it will not be submitted anywhere else for publication prior to acceptance/rejection by this Journal.
3. By submitting the paper entitled below, the undersigned author agrees to transfer the rights to publish and distribute the paper in an international e-journal (entitled above) to Publisher.
4. The undersigned author agrees to make a reasonable effort to conform to Publisher's submission guidelines and to liaise with the editor to ensure that the requirements of these guidelines are met to a reasonable degree.
5. The corresponding author signs for and accepts responsibility for releasing this material on behalf of any and all coauthors. This agreement is to be signed by at least one of the authors who has obtained the assent of the co-author(s) where applicable. After submission of this agreement signed by the corresponding author, changes of authorship or in the order of the authors listed will not be accepted.
