The Importance of Perception and Imagination in Designing 3D Image

  • Mohd Khairulnizam Ramlie Universiti Teknologi MARA Perak Branch, Seri Iskandar Campus, 32610 Seri Iskandar, Perak, MALAYSIA
  • Hanafi Mohd Tahir Universiti Teknologi MARA Perak Branch, Seri Iskandar Campus, 32610 Seri Iskandar, Perak, MALAYSIA
  • Ahmad Sofiyuddin Mohd Shuib Universiti Teknologi MARA Perak Branch, Seri Iskandar Campus, 32610 Seri Iskandar, Perak, MALAYSIA
DOI: https://doi.org/10.24191/idealogy.v3i2.63

Abstract

3D animation and modelling has been known as one of the main subjects in the field of Arts and Design in Malaysia. This subject is applicable to all fields in the Faculty of Art and Design, including courses offered at the Universiti Teknologi MARA. As we all know, this 3D subject requires students to have great visual skills. In order to produce an attractive design, students need to have good memory, cognitive, and perceptual skills. However, problems arise when final year students of graphic design and digital media departments are found to be incompetent in that aspect. Thus, this study aims to investigate the problems and identify the most suitable time to apply so that the problems can be solved when students are in their final year of study.
Keywords: 3D Image, Education, Multimedia, Cognitive skills

References

Adán, A., Salamanca, S., & Merchán, P. (2012). A hybrid human computer approach for recovering incomplete cultural heritage pieces. Computers and Graphics (Pergamon), 36(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cag.2011.10.003

Atwood, G. (1971). An experimental study of visual imagination and memory.

Bowman, D. A., Kruijff, E., LaViola, J. J., & Poupyrev, I. (2001). An Introduction to 3-D User Interface Design. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 10(1), 96–108. https://doi.org/10.1162/105474601750182342

Cockburn, A. (2004). Revisiting 2D vs 3D Implications on Spatial Memory.

Cockburn, A., & McKenzie, B. (2002). Evaluating the effectiveness of spatial memory in 2D and 3D physical and virtual environments. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems Changing Our World, Changing Ourselves - CHI ’02, (4), 203. https://doi.org/10.1145/503376.503413

Cognitive Psychology, 2(3), 290–299. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(71)90015-6

Finlayson, N. J., Zhang, X., & Golomb, J. D. (2017). Differential patterns of 2D location versus depth decoding along the visual hierarchy. NeuroImage, 147, 507–516. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.12.039

GeoInformatica, 9(1), 5–32. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10707-004-5620-8

Gerson, H. B. P., Sorby, S. A., Wysocki, A., & Baartmans, B. J. (2001). The Development and Assessment of Multimedia Software for Improving 3-D Spatial Visualization Skills. Computer Applications in Engineering Education, 9(2), 105–113. https://doi.org/10.1002/cae.1012

Hegarty, M. (2011). The cognitive science of visual-spatial displays: Implications for design. Topics in Cognitive Science, 3(3), 446–474. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1756-8765.2011.01150.x

Hinckley, K., Pausch, R., Goble, J. C., & Kassell, N. F. (1994). A survey of design issues in spatial input. In Proceedings of the 7th annual ACM symposium on User interface software and technology - UIST ’94 (pp. 213–222). https://doi.org/10.1145/192426.192501

Hoisl, F., & Shea, K. (2011). Interactive, visual 3D spatial grammars. In Design Computing and Cognition ’10 (pp. 643–662). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94- 007-0510-4_34

https://doi.org/10.1109/TABLETOP.2006.28

Huk, T. (2006). Who benefits from learning with 3D models? The case of spatial ability. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365- 2729.2006.00180.x

Journal of Visualization and Computer Animation, 13(4), 199–209. https://doi.org/10.1002/vis.289

Kim, M. J., & Maher, M. Lou. (2008). The impact of tangible user interfaces on spatial cognition during collaborative design. Design Studies, 29(3), 222–253. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2007.12.006

Kozhevnikov, M., Kosslyn, S., & Shephard, J. (2005). Spatial versus object visualizers: A new characterization of visual cognitive style. Memory and Cognition, 33(4), 710–726. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03195337

LaViola, J. J., & Keefe, D. F. (2011). {3D} spatial interaction: applications for art, design, and science. {ACM} {SIGGRAPH} 2011 Courses, 1:1–1:75. https://doi.org/10.1145/2037636.2037637

Leahy, W., & Sweller, J. (2004). Cognitive load and the imagination effect. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 18(7), 857–875. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.1061

Li, C.-L., Aivar, M. P., Kit, D. M., Tong, M. H., & Hayhoe, M. M. (2016).

López-Sastre, R. J., García-Fuertes, A., Redondo-Cabrera, C., Acevedo- Rodríguez, F. J., & Maldonado-Bascón, S. (2013). Evaluating 3D spatial pyramids for classifying 3D shapes. Computers and Graphics (Pergamon), 37(5), 473–483. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cag.2013.04.003

Maher, M. Lou, & Kim, M. J. (2006). Studying designers using a tabletop system for 3D design with a focus on the impact on spatial cognition. In Proceedings of the First IEEE International Workshop on Horizontal Interactive Human-Computer Systems, TABLETOP’06 (Vol. 2006, pp. 105–112).

Markson, L., & Paterson, K. B. (2009). Effects of gaze-aversion on visual-spatial imagination. British Journal of Psychology, 100(3), 553–563. https://doi.org/10.1348/000712608X371762

Marsh, T., & Watt, A. (2016). Shape your imagination: iconic gestural-based interaction. Proceedings. IEEE 1998 Virtual Reality Annual International Symposium (Cat. No.98CB36180), (January), 122–125. https://doi.org/10.1109/VRAIS.1998.658465

Memory and visual search in naturalistic 2D and 3D environments. Journal of Vision, 16(8), 9. https://doi.org/10.1167/16.8.9

Pollefeys, M. (2004). Visual 3D Modeling from Images. Vmv, 143. https://doi.org/10.1002/vis.289

Pollefeys, M., & Van Gool, L. (2002). Visual modelling: From images to images.

Proceedings of the Fifth Conference on Australasian User Interface - Volume 28, 28, 25–31. https://doi.org/10.1109/INFVIS.2001.963291

Rahimian, F. P., & Ibrahim, R. (2011). Impacts of VR 3D sketching on novice designers’ spatial cognition in collaborative conceptual architectural design. Design Studies, 32(3), 255–291. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2010.10.003

Redondo-Cabrera, C., Lopez-Sastre, R. J., Acevedo-Rodriguez, J., & Maldonado- Bascon, S. (2012). SURFing the point clouds: Selective 3D spatial pyramids for category-level object recognition. In Proceedings of the IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (pp. 3458–3465). https://doi.org/10.1109/CVPR.2012.6248087

Sprague, K. B., & de Kemp, E. A. (2005). Interpretive tools for 3-D structural geological modelling part II: Surface design from sparse spatial data.

Todd, J. T. (2004). The visual perception of 3D shape. Trends in Cognitive Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2004.01.006

Tory, M., Kirkpatrick, A. E., Atkins, M. S., & Moller, T. (2006). Visualization task performance with 2D, 3D, and combination displays. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 12(1), 2–13. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2006.17
Published
2018-09-07
How to Cite
RAMLIE, Mohd Khairulnizam; MOHD TAHIR, Hanafi; MOHD SHUIB, Ahmad Sofiyuddin. The Importance of Perception and Imagination in Designing 3D Image. Idealogy Journal, [S.l.], v. 3, n. 2, p. 215-222, sep. 2018. ISSN 2550-214X. Available at: <https://idealogyjournal.com/ojs/index.php/idealogy/article/view/63>. Date accessed: 23 nov. 2024. doi: https://doi.org/10.24191/idealogy.v3i2.63.
Citation Formats
Issue
Vol 3 No 2 (2018): Idealogy Journal (September 2018)
Section
Review Article
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

UiTM Press (the Publisher) has agreed to publish the undersigned author’s paper in Idealogy Journal. The agreement is contingent upon the fulfilment of a number of requirements listed below.

1. The undersigned author warrants that the paper entitled below is original, that it is not in any way libellous or unlawful in Malaysia, that it does not infringe any copyright or other proprietary right. The undersigned hereby represents and warrants that he/she is the author of the paper, except for material that is clearly identified as to its original source, with permission notices from the copyright owners where required. The undersigned represents that he/she has the power and authority to sign and execute this agreement.
2. The undersigned author warrants that the paper entitled below has not been published elsewhere, and also it will not be submitted anywhere else for publication prior to acceptance/rejection by this Journal.
3. By submitting the paper entitled below, the undersigned author agrees to transfer the rights to publish and distribute the paper in an international e-journal (entitled above) to Publisher.
4. The undersigned author agrees to make a reasonable effort to conform to Publisher's submission guidelines and to liaise with the editor to ensure that the requirements of these guidelines are met to a reasonable degree.
5. The corresponding author signs for and accepts responsibility for releasing this material on behalf of any and all coauthors. This agreement is to be signed by at least one of the authors who has obtained the assent of the co-author(s) where applicable. After submission of this agreement signed by the corresponding author, changes of authorship or in the order of the authors listed will not be accepted.