This is an outdated version published on 2025-05-26. Read the most recent version.

Identifying Augmented Reality (AR) Design Component For Mural Design In Kuala Lumpur

Authors

  • Muhammad Zahin Zulkifly College of Creative Arts, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Puncak Alam, Selangor Malaysia
  • Inda Murni Hairul Anuar College of Creative Arts, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Puncak Alam, Selangor Malaysia
  • Sharkawi Che Din College of Creative Arts, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Puncak Alam, Selangor Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24191/idealogy.v10i1.759

Abstract

This study investigates the design components for enhancing engagement and accessibility of
augmented reality (AR) murals in Kuala Lumpur. Augmented Reality (AR) technology within the
existing murals can revitalize public areas and bring new interactions to the public. The main
objective of this study is to explore the key design elements that make Augmented Reality (AR)
effective and to understand how these elements work together to enhance AR experiences. It looks at
how the visuals were put together, how users interact with the technology and how AR blends with
physical spaces. By implementing content analysis on existing murals in Kuala Lumpur, this study
observes the design principles used to achieve immersion and interactivity. The results of the study
are to understand the importance of interface aesthetics and user experience, the role of colour,
intuitive design experience and space in developing engaging AR experiences. According to the study,
integration of these design features can make AR murals more interactive, visually engaging, and
culturally significant, offering a stepping stone to developing immersive urban arts. The findings of
this research present a definite guideline for the application of Augmented Reality (AR) to revitalize
Kuala Lumpur murals to be more accessible and enjoyable for a broader audience.

Keywords: Street art mural, Visual Communication

References

Amad, B. (2023). Interface aesthetic in augmented reality design. Journal of Interactive Media Design, 15(1), 123–134.

Augmented Island Studios. (2024). Enhancing the public art experience through augmented reality.

Biermann, B. (2018). Augmented reality, art, and public space. ACM SIGGRAPH 2018 Talks.

Billinghurst, M., Clark, A., & Lee, G. (2015). A survey of augmented reality. Foundations and Trends® in Human–Computer Interaction, 8(2–3), 73–272. https://doi.org/10.1561/1100000049

Caggianese, G., Marzullo, F., & Lippiello, V. (2021). Exploring the role of augmented reality in urban regeneration. In Proceedings of the 2021 International Conference on Smart Cities and Urban Design (pp. 234–242). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/SCUD.2021.00056

Chung, E. J., Lee, Y., & Moon, S. (2022). Digital augmentation in urban spaces: The future of cultural heritage in cities. Journal of Urban Design and Technology, 30(3), 354–367. https://doi.org/10.1080/13574809.2022.2054769

Dovey, K., Wollan, S., & Woodcock, I. (2012). Street art and the urban imaginary. Urban Studies, 49(7), 1385–1407. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098011425191

Garrett, J. J. (2011). The elements of user experience: User-centered design for the web and beyond (2nd ed.). Pearson.

Gu, Y., Wang, Q., & Gu, W. (2023). The innovative application of visual communication design in modern art design. Electronics.

Irvine, L. (2012). Street art as a global movement. Art Journal, 71(1), 39–51. https://doi.org/10.1080/00043249.2012.11024745

Jurado, C. (2021). The role of color in visual communication design. Journal of Visual Arts, 18(4), 456–472.

Kamaruddin, N., & Ishak, N. A. (2022). Exploration of Malaysian public awareness towards visual on street art mural as a medium of communication. Malaysian Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities (MJSSH).

Lidwell, W., Holden, K., & Butler, J. (2010). Universal principles of design (2nd ed.). Rockport Publishers.

Muhammad, S., & Mohd Din, N. (2023). The introduction of street art's etymology-related context and discipline against an artwork in the public space. Idealogy Journal, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.24191/idealogy.v8i1.414

Norman, D. A. (2004). Emotional design: Why we love (or hate) everyday things. Norman, D. A. (2013). The design of everyday things: Revised and expanded edition.

Ross, J. (2016). Rebel art: The evolution of street art in the 20th and 21st centuries. University of Oxford Press.

Shi, Y., Abdul Ghafar, M., & Faiz Yahaya, M. (2024). Augmented reality for interactive experiences in museums: A review. Idealogy Journal, 9(2). https://doi.org/10.24191/idealogy.v9i2.551

Smith, S. (2021). Authenticity and the digital evolution of street art: The impact of augmented reality on urban murals. Journal of Urban Culture and Art, 12(3), 46–63. https://doi.org/10.1080/07324346.2021.1914852

Syed Rizakri, S., Mohamed Ghazali, N., Mohd Lazim, N., & Che Din, S. (2024). An inspiration analysis of digital illustration used in augmented reality. Idealogy Journal, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.24191/idealogy.v9i1.497

Tanner, J., & Meyer, D. (2020). The impact of augmented reality on public art: Enhancing mural experiences in urban spaces. Digital Media Journal, 14(2), 89–107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.digmedia.2020.04.004

Young, A. (2014). Graffiti and street art: The politics of aesthetics. Sociology of Art, 56(3), 255–278. https://doi.org/10.1080/03071645.2014.929212

Published

2025-05-26

Versions

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>